Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Devil_Anse; All

Douglas Mansfield and Jeannie Overall know when you're lying.

Both have spent 20 years watching for the telltale signs: a jumpy pulse, a sweaty palm or a pause before a breath.

As polygraph examiners for the California Department of Justice, they spend most of their time asking questions about murder, kidnapping and child molestation. Combined, they average about 400 tests a year, traveling from one city to the next.

The recent disappearance of former intern Chandra Levy in Washington, D.C., and her connection with Rep. Gary Condit, D-Ceres, have increased focus on the polygraph field as the merits of lie-detector machines are debated.

The state attorney general's office has provided a polygraph exam service to law enforcement agencies across the state since the 1970s. Without the service, many of the state's small police departments couldn't afford such an exam.

Polygraphs aren't perfect, authorities say. But when combined with proper interview techniques, they can provide criminal investigators with key clues and confessions.

"You would be surprised how many people just confess ... during interviews," Mansfield said. "The interview is just as important as the test itself."

Douglas Mansfield and Jeannie Overall don't know when you're lying. They can only guess. The article goes on to note that the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department has adopted the cheaper competing pseudoscience of voice stress analysis.


69 posted on 07/06/2004 2:13:10 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Devil_Anse; All
Oops, I didn't write that last paragraph. The people at the anti-polygraph site did write it. I was just trying to find out who this Mansfield guy was.

Link

71 posted on 07/06/2004 2:22:51 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: RGSpincich

Thanks for the info, RG! Sounds like Scott didn't want to protest too vehemently against taking a polygraph, so he probably let them lead him along until it came down to taking it--at that point, he refused. (And he had spoken to McAllister, hadn't he?)

The state has to walk a fine line on the questioning of this witness, if, as I speculate, he was originally brought in to administer a polygraph. Any indvertant mention of a polygraph is going to send Geragos back into orbit.

We must admit that after interviewing so many people, he probably MUST know quite a bit about deceptive behavior and how to spot it, don't you think?


77 posted on 07/06/2004 2:56:19 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson