Posted on 07/06/2004 5:29:41 AM PDT by runningbear
This guy is BURIED in lies!! I think I've said it a few times, it's worth repeating, Peterson is going to bury himself with his own mouth!!
I've never heard that her maternity pants had a pocket. In fact, though I've owned them, I've never seen maternity pants with a pocket.
Of course, she could've put the house key in the pocket of her coat... aw, but, darn it, Scott says she didn't wear a coat that day, didn't he?
Can't wait till they play all the TV interviews he stupidly did!
IF the neighbourhood were that bad, I'm sure they would have moved. BULLchit!! Again more of Peterson's bullchit!
And coincidentally, her purse and keys were hanging in the closet!!
And wouldn't it be funny if there was no pepper spray in the purse?
FYI-
Key Vote (Laci and Conner's Bill)
Fetal Protection - Passage
Bill Number: HR 1997
Issue: Abortion Issues
Date: 03/25/2004
Sponsor: Bill sponsored by Representative Hart, R-PA
Roll Call Number: 0063
Bill Passed
Full Member List
Senator John Reid Edwards voted NO.
Senator John Forbes Kerry voted NO.
Vote to pass a bill that would make it a criminal offense to harm or kill a fetus during the commission of a violent crime.
HR 1997 Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004
Vote to pass a bill that would make it a criminal offense to harm or kill a fetus during the commission of a violent crime. The measure would set criminal penalties, the same as those that would apply if harm or death happened to the pregnant woman, for those who harm a fetus. It is not required that the individual have prior knowledge of the pregnancy or intent to harm the fetus. This bill prohibits the death penalty from being imposed for such an offense. The bill states that its provisions should not be interpreted to apply a woman's actions with respect to her pregnancy.
(Bill sponsored by Representative Hart, R-PA)
Bill Passed 61-38: R 48-2; D 13-35;I 0-1 on 03/25/2004.
Bill Status
Bill Number: HR 1997 -108th Congress (2003-2004)
House Passage Vote: 02/26/2004- Outcome: Passed
Senate Passage Vote: 03/25/2004-Outcome: Passed
Presidential Action: Signed on 04/01/2004
Thanks Maggie!! Interesting huh?
Douglas Mansfield and Jeannie Overall know when you're lying.
Both have spent 20 years watching for the telltale signs: a jumpy pulse, a sweaty palm or a pause before a breath.
As polygraph examiners for the California Department of Justice, they spend most of their time asking questions about murder, kidnapping and child molestation. Combined, they average about 400 tests a year, traveling from one city to the next.
The recent disappearance of former intern Chandra Levy in Washington, D.C., and her connection with Rep. Gary Condit, D-Ceres, have increased focus on the polygraph field as the merits of lie-detector machines are debated.
The state attorney general's office has provided a polygraph exam service to law enforcement agencies across the state since the 1970s. Without the service, many of the state's small police departments couldn't afford such an exam.
Polygraphs aren't perfect, authorities say. But when combined with proper interview techniques, they can provide criminal investigators with key clues and confessions.
"You would be surprised how many people just confess ... during interviews," Mansfield said. "The interview is just as important as the test itself."
Douglas Mansfield and Jeannie Overall don't know when you're lying. They can only guess. The article goes on to note that the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department has adopted the cheaper competing pseudoscience of voice stress analysis.
Dev just listen to THIS red herring. You know Catherine Crier's BIG NEWS TODAY. A Deanna Renfro pawned a croton watch on December 31, 2004. She is married to "Donnie" Renfro of the tan van with barbeque stains fame. HOWEVER, Robyn Rocha was already shown THIS watch that was pawned in Court and COULD NOT identify it as the one belonging to Laci's inherited one. It is SO OBVIOUS GeragGAG is behind this. DISingenuious, DISceitful, DISgusting, and on and on!! HOW could Catherine Crier, KNOWING full well that the Rocha's could NOT identify THIS watch as the one Laci had, DARE TO come up with this as a BIG DEFENSE SCOOP??????? She is on my IGNORE list from now on.
Hopefully she will have the opportunity to testify how she obtained the watch. And who instructed her to pawn it. Dalton is gone but not forgotten.
WHOOPS, make that December 31, 2002.!! Just read that Catherine Crier has a psychiatrist on who is rather tearing Peterson to shreds. There is a statement that there is a phone call (wiretap) where Scott is talking to his mother and wants to give all the baby stuff to a family member who is about to have a baby. He then phones back and says he better wait a bit cause it might not "look right"!! I wish I knew WHEN this conversation took place.
Oh yes, Mr. Dalton!! All I know is read that Robyn Rocha could NOT identify the watch as the one that Laci had inherited. IMO ANOTHER RED HERRING!!
Thank you, Maggie!
As much as I deplore the murders of the innocent Laci and Connor, I have mixed feelings about this bill. This bill has already been used, or attempted to be used, by a woman seeking to keep from being deported when she was due to be deported. It had to do with the fact that she was pregnant.
Also, I am distrustful of too many sweeping federal laws. The arrogance of our lawmakers is disgusting; they think they can solve every problem just by making yet another law, and they can't.
I am, of course, against the killing of the unborn (and of the born!)
I'm so glad you wrote your last sentence. *grin*
Thanks for the info, RG! Sounds like Scott didn't want to protest too vehemently against taking a polygraph, so he probably let them lead him along until it came down to taking it--at that point, he refused. (And he had spoken to McAllister, hadn't he?)
The state has to walk a fine line on the questioning of this witness, if, as I speculate, he was originally brought in to administer a polygraph. Any indvertant mention of a polygraph is going to send Geragos back into orbit.
We must admit that after interviewing so many people, he probably MUST know quite a bit about deceptive behavior and how to spot it, don't you think?
LOL... I thought you sounded rather skeptical!
Oh, brother. Well, let's see how close they get to magically changing this unknown watch into LACI'S watch.
The DA will simply deal with this through cross-examination and his rebuttal case. We haven't gotten to see these DA's cross-examine yet. Hope they're good.
Even though Catherine Crier is reporting on this, I fail to see how this could have come in as "evidence" yet. Enough of Geragos' innuendo and secret "tips" to the media--let's see HIM have to put HIS evidence through the ringer in court!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.