Having Hillary Clinton run on any presidential ticket is, for many of us, high on our list of things we'd never want to be exposed to, just below "being on a nude beach in the French Riviera and seeing Michael Moore playing volleyball." That's just too funny.
1 posted on
07/05/2004 4:54:44 PM PDT by
wagglebee
To: wagglebee
A running mate with a soft look and feminine qualities may help accomplish this – but what if John Edwards doesn't want the job?Kudos, Doug Powers, your article has that certain "Steynian" quality.
2 posted on
07/05/2004 4:58:14 PM PDT by
NonValueAdded
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" HRC 6/28/2004)
To: wagglebee
I think the beast would make a fine VP candidate as she'd mobilize conservatives in numbers never seen before.
3 posted on
07/05/2004 5:00:14 PM PDT by
South40
(Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
To: wagglebee
"Toeing the line," not "towing."
4 posted on
07/05/2004 5:04:14 PM PDT by
ScottFromSpokane
(Re-elect President Bush: http://spokanegop.org/bush.html)
To: Mo1; Howlin; glock rocks
5 posted on
07/05/2004 5:06:07 PM PDT by
Brad’s Gramma
(Make Hillary happy.... IGNORE the Freepathon!!!!)
To: wagglebee
6 posted on
07/05/2004 5:08:49 PM PDT by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
To: wagglebee
Chris Matthews (NBC Today Show???) was speculating on Kerry's running mate. He envisioned Kerry choosing Hill-o-beans Clinton AND winning the election in 2004 AND being re-elected in 2008, which would give SHRILLERY 8 MORE years in the White House. Then Matthews went off the deep end, and suggested that HITLERY would then be able to seek the presidency itself - for yet ANOTHER 8 years!!!
I know IT TAKES A VILLAGE TO RAISE AN IDIOT - but imagine having the whole country turning into IDIOTS under her spell - for a grand total of 24 YEARS!!!
Just look at what a majority of voters has been doing in Massachusetts - Ted Kennedy is senator-for-life, Barney Frank is possibly representative for life....
Just imagine Hillary's list of running mates - Michael Moore, for starters...
7 posted on
07/05/2004 5:13:01 PM PDT by
albertp
(Malice in Blunderland, The Wizard of Odd, and Gullible's Troubles, too!)
To: wagglebee
Naaaaaaaaaa...Hillery will not be the choice. It will be Gephardt, or Edwards.
To: wagglebee
Hillary has just too many negatives in her poll numbers to be a benefit, not to mention it would give the Bush campaign some incredible fodder. I don't think much of Kerry but from every thing I have read he is not an out right crook like they are. Hillary caries a lot of criminal baggage!
To: wagglebee
Love the title! Hate the thought.
12 posted on
07/05/2004 5:43:44 PM PDT by
mombonn
(¡Viva Bush/Cheney!)
To: wagglebee
It will never happen. Placing Hillary on the ticket will give Bush a 3% to 4% bump and the DNC knows it.
Placing Hillary on the ballot would force wavering conservatives back into Bush's camp.
15 posted on
07/05/2004 5:52:23 PM PDT by
Amerigomag
(What's wrong with the US....three little letters......FDR)
To: wagglebee
If Kerry chooses Hillary or a black man as a running mate then I would wager there would be more people shooting and taking pokes at him than at a two dollar prostitute on payday outside a Naval base.
Kerry choosing Hillary would mean that he has a death wish.
18 posted on
07/05/2004 6:35:23 PM PDT by
vetvetdoug
(In memory of S/Sgt. Segundo Baldanado, Albuquerque, NM-KIA Bien Hoa AFB, RVN 1965)
To: wagglebee
John Kerry's food taster would be the first to know. ROFLOL!!!!!!!!
19 posted on
07/05/2004 7:54:14 PM PDT by
exhaustedmomma
(Where are the bookmarked threads??????????)
To: wagglebee
Be afraid, very afraid.
20 posted on
07/05/2004 8:09:10 PM PDT by
NYC GOP Chick
(Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall! -- RIP, President Reagan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson