To: Tailgunner Joe
"I should think the potential of this doctrine to allow judges to substitute their personal predelictions for the will of the Congress is so self-evident from the case which spawned it as to require no further discussion of its susceptibility to abuse." But of course, you have no problem with activist judges, so long as they're the right sort of activist judges. Isn't that right?
80 posted on
07/05/2004 4:28:55 PM PDT by
general_re
(Drive offensively - the life you save may be your own.)
To: general_re
81 posted on
07/05/2004 4:31:24 PM PDT by
Tailgunner Joe
(You CAN legislate morality.)
To: general_re
"The
central support for the Court's ultimate conclusion that Congress did not intend the law to cover Christian ministers is its lengthy review of the "mass of organic utterances" establishing that "this is a Christian nation,"...
Not dicta. Central support.
83 posted on
07/05/2004 4:35:59 PM PDT by
Tailgunner Joe
(You CAN legislate morality.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson