To: summer
The writer was certainly titillated with the notion that Christian women who read the Bible could also be passionate wives who are comfortable with their sexuality and enjoy marital relations.
To: ValerieUSA
The [NYT] writer was certainly titillated with the notion that Christian women who read the Bible could also be passionate wives who are comfortable with their sexuality and enjoy marital relations.
Yes, I know what you mean.
49 posted on
07/03/2004 8:45:28 PM PDT by
summer
To: ValerieUSA
The writer was certainly titillated with the notion that Christian women who read the Bible could also be passionate wives who are comfortable with their sexuality and enjoy marital relations.My gut reaction is that this is an example of a New York writer thinking that because she writes for the New York Times, she knows everything. But you have to admit that such a prejudice isn't totally unjustified when you have a state government banning the sale of vibrators.
119 posted on
07/03/2004 11:16:26 PM PDT by
L.N. Smithee
(Michael MOOOOOOore is full of bull)
To: ValerieUSA
The writer was certainly titillated with the notion that Christian women who read the Bible could also be passionate wives who are comfortable with their sexuality and enjoy marital relations. Based on some of the sex-phobic comments of many of the religious Freepers on threads like this, I'm not sure she's totally off-base.
209 posted on
07/04/2004 11:40:20 AM PDT by
Modernman
("I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as members" -Groucho Marx)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson