Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam court coverage was 'shambolic'
Guardian ^ | 07/02/04 | Claire Cozens

Posted on 07/03/2004 6:29:40 PM PDT by Pikamax

Saddam court coverage was 'shambolic'

Claire Cozens, press and publishing correspondent Friday July 2, 2004

Saddam coverage: 'just the way things are done here at the moment'

The world's media descended on Baghdad this week to witness the historic court appearance of the former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. But for journalists covering the hearing it was an exercise in enormous frustration, with only a handful of media organisations allowed in to the court room. Broadcasters and press alike were furious with the arrangements, which left print journalists struggling to obtain any information on the day that one of the most hated men in the world was finally brought to court.

"We were told the night before what the arrangements would be - but by the morning of the hearing they had changed completely," said a staff member of one international broadcaster. "It's been a bit of a shambles, no one had a clue what was going on."

CNN and the Arabic TV station al-Jazeera were the only two TV stations to be allowed into the court room, while only one print journalist - the New York Times' chief foreign correspondent John Burns - was given access.

Although CNN made its footage available to other broadcasters, it was yesterday insisting its star reporter Christiane Amanpour was there in a "unilateral" capacity after she was granted access by the director of the Iraqi special tribunal, Salem Chalabi, and her reports were branded exclusive.

Mr Chalabi's involvement in the trial - which was expected to take two years to come to court - is already undermining the credibility of the proceedings.

He is the nephew of Ahmed Chalabi, one of Saddam's most vociferous opponents and the man America once backed as would-be leader of Iraq, now accused of treachery against the US and of peddling disinformation about non-existent weapons of mass destruction.

Last night the BBC's John Simpson had to make do with interviewing an American journalist - ABC anchor Peter Jennings - who had gained access to the court after making the same "unilateral" request to the Americans running proceedings.

Print journalists fared even worse, forced to rely on soundless TV images of the proceedings, together with the testimony of an Arabic-speaking CNN producer who had been in court but had not been warned he would be the sole witness of events in the courtroom.

In a televised briefing to journalists, the producer admitted his notes had been intended for his own use and for background colour.

The Guardian's Baghdad correspondent Rory McCarthy described the process as a "shambolic".

"With no audio it was impossible," he said. "The arrangements for the handover were the same - that's just the way things are done here at the moment."

No audio recording of the proceedings was available, although Burns provided a short tape recording in which he described the appearance of the court before the hearing began, but only a single quote from Saddam - "I am Saddam Hussein, president of Iraq".

At 8.30pm local time, Burns finally gave a briefing to the gathered press - too late for British newspaper deadlines.

But no local media organisations were present, and the only Iraqi journalist there was asked to leave before the proceedings began fully.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; iraqitribunal; mediabias; prisonersaddam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 07/03/2004 6:29:40 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

I like hearing about the suddenly changing arrangements. It is an elementary (and very good) security measure. Good work!


2 posted on 07/03/2004 6:34:46 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

No wonder media coverage was so negative; the media hates when it isn't given access, and finds other reasons to criticize people who do that to them (because they would look petty if the criticism was directed at the fact that they weren't given access).


3 posted on 07/03/2004 6:37:09 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

"Broadcasters and press alike were furious with the arrangements"

The press needs to realise the process is desighned to allow justice to be meted out to criminals,not provide them with good copy.

Quit whining,Presstitutes.


4 posted on 07/03/2004 6:37:41 PM PDT by Redcoat LI (You Can Trust Me , I'm Not Like The Others.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcoat LI

Who was the mind numbingly stupid "coalition" guy that let this happen. Sadaam spun this kid justice of the peace in the ground and put the fear back in the people of iraq. I have seen some stupid moves in my days but nothing to rival giving this guy a soap box and then I heard tonight on drudge or "My way" or something that our puppet has "gone off the reservation" and announced "amnesty" for Al Queada who have killed our boys. Have we totally lost it?


5 posted on 07/03/2004 6:50:31 PM PDT by dumbojimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Rory McCarthy described the process as a "shambolic".

Is that like "beeberiffic, or "stunedidious"?

FMCDH(BITS)

6 posted on 07/03/2004 6:51:58 PM PDT by nothingnew (KERRY: "If at first you don't deceive, lie, lie again!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcoat LI
Perhaps they are very afraid that someday,
somewhere, some of the mainstream media
will be tried for their action during this War.


In Baghdad, former Iraqi tyrant, murderer, and rapist,
Saddam Hussein is led by guards into the courtroom.


Watban Ibrahim Hassan al-Tikriti, presidential advisor and half-brother of Saddam Hussein.



7 posted on 07/03/2004 6:53:11 PM PDT by Diogenesis (We do only what we are meant to do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dumbojimbo

dumbojimbo aka youareso, UdlotI, Itoldu, mrbuns, JBSCOTCH, screenname5, deetermined, gogoline, medarville, grandlodgemi, canyondweller, lightening Bug, sanjonnm, polymolly, ironandfire, gollymolly, mollygolly, madridkid, barrister2, sceenname, dolliegirl, gotohelgemrob, westernsizzler, urworstnm, bkagan, mybonnielassie, fiddlerscove, iwannabe, malinthropy, fayetteky, jimlumpit, lucckyu, runningbare, winslowaz, happyface3, cyclops2, polibuz, footballisking, jollytime, decibel, memosmemo, aberdeensd, stomponu, hollycourt, larrylament, allaglow, mrgiggles, stevenprice, pizzaboy, budlight2, marvomagic, horizon3, bellathecat, everyfriday, reflector, taosbum, igotfreedom, ascenciones, clonehead2, ilikeike2, millydcat aka emasculated, delbertandwilma, applevalleyman, mitymikie, elmosfire, moonbeam, moonbounce, miteymo, woodypecker, GWMDB, diamondbill, sundaywalker2, sundaywalker, leapinglizzard, austinred, chewchew2, Rebel63, DOLLYANDBELLA, footballisking, horizon3, alilrainmustfall, mollyshouse, theredraider, lonelynlove, bellathecat, everyfriday, STANDUPANDFITE, CLONESTONE, reflector, replacement4multi, taosbum, wokeupdismornin, igotfreedom, petenrepeat, birdman2, groundhogday, turninproud, nomoney, downtheriver, keeponrollin, bigwheel, wadecollins, silverlizzard perrogrande, littledog, dollylolly, doublet, chiefraincloud, Mr.Cahthey, Channelcat, dollygirl, greyhawk, 325eye, michellcraig, augustus, virginiacreeper, zuluoscar, buffalo124, collin, Dr.Cookie, et al, zotted again.


8 posted on 07/03/2004 7:03:28 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nothingnew
Is that like "beeberiffic, or "stunedidious"?

I thought it might have something to do with the term "Shambala" used by Three Dog Night.
9 posted on 07/03/2004 7:05:57 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Dear Presstitutes: Put some ice on it.


10 posted on 07/03/2004 7:10:48 PM PDT by clintonh8r ("Just because I could.......")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Some of 'em just won't give up.....


11 posted on 07/03/2004 7:14:19 PM PDT by clintonh8r ("Just because I could.......")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

*stares in awe* WOW. Is that a record (for number of screen names)?


12 posted on 07/03/2004 7:35:52 PM PDT by Severa (Wife of Freeper Hostel, USN STS3(SS))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Severa

that is, awe that someone has that much time on their hands to be a complete and total waste of space that is...


13 posted on 07/03/2004 7:37:25 PM PDT by Severa (Wife of Freeper Hostel, USN STS3(SS))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Bless you, JimRob! I was about to do a search and hit abuse on the appropriately named zotee.
14 posted on 07/03/2004 7:45:16 PM PDT by reformedliberal (Proud Bush-Cheney04 volunteer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal

What happened to him? There don't even seem to be any ashes left.


15 posted on 07/03/2004 7:57:17 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dumbojimbo

Bump.


16 posted on 07/03/2004 8:39:04 PM PDT by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Let me translate:

Whine, whine, whine, whine, whine, *guilt by association*, whine, lie, whine, lie, whine, whine, whine....

That about sums up this 'reporting'.


17 posted on 07/03/2004 8:43:30 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Independence forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Seems the kitties did their job well!


18 posted on 07/03/2004 9:26:42 PM PDT by reformedliberal (Proud Bush-Cheney04 volunteer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax; All

I believe the Guardian is Truly "Shambolic"!!!!


19 posted on 07/03/2004 9:29:01 PM PDT by Defender2 (Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
"...no one had a clue what was going on."

That sums it up for me. The "press" with their panties in a knot.

FRegards JR

20 posted on 07/03/2004 9:36:50 PM PDT by smoothsailing (Eagles Up !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson