[Long Cut]

RP's post # 18 has this: " After school ended Friday, one student threatened another and claimed to have a weapon." Note, no weapon was found, and the type unspecified.

Next we have RP's post #51, in which he states, "A student threatened another with a weapon".

He repeats this again in the post I'm pinging to now: "The Friday before the raid, one student threatened another with a weapon." Note again, no relationship to any "drug gangs" is specified, even in his own article.

So, RP, now that we've caught you in a lie, or at the very least a deliberate misstatement of the facts with a bit of spin on the backside, anything ELSE you should be retracting?

[robertpaulsen]

"So, RP, now that we've caught you in a lie"

You "caught" me in squat.

Based on published stories, I'm telling you the information that school officials and the police had prior to the raid. Their resultant actions were based on that information.

You have a problem with that, take it to your priest.