Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McMaster: S.C. school drug raid was legal
http://www.wsoctv.com/news/3487575/detail.html ^

Posted on 07/03/2004 3:15:07 PM PDT by Stew Padasso

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last
To: Stew Padasso

Why were guns pulled? That seems real unusual.


81 posted on 07/06/2004 11:36:26 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salo
"on unarmed children"

And they knew that before the raid?

Even though drug dealing and guns go hand-in-hand? Even though drugs were being dealt by an organized group of individuals (complete with lookouts) in the school hallway? Even though they had a report that the Friday before a student was threatened with a weapon?

82 posted on 07/06/2004 11:45:00 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
What if that had been your children being video recorded buying drugs from other students in that very same hallway?

How about this... they have vidoe tape of kids allegedly dealing drugs. How about the detain and question those kids, rather than storm an entire hallway harrassing the entire student body?

83 posted on 07/06/2004 12:59:02 PM PDT by bird4four4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bird4four4

"They're pretty knowledgeable in terms of where to stand. They know where the cameras are. If they stand directly under them, the cameras don't look directly down," Aarons said. "Faculty can view the students from other cameras, but from quite a distance away. They see silhouettes."


84 posted on 07/06/2004 1:13:50 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

Right, they can't see the actual transaction take place under the camera, but they've got a pretty good suspicion of whats happening. They should then be able to tell by them walking toward or away from the cameras which students are involved, and then take the issue up with them only.


85 posted on 07/06/2004 1:20:06 PM PDT by bird4four4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant
Sorry about the mini rant, LE is my hot button

Don't apologize, you are right on target.

It makes me sick to see what the police have become. Wannabe military types with buzzcuts that think that we 'peons' are beneath them.

86 posted on 07/06/2004 1:26:42 PM PDT by Looking4Truth (NEVER trust Muslims to keep their word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
They were watching the children "dealing drugs on video," remember? No weapons were seen - or found. If they had expected weapons, storming the hallway with 100+ children in it was the poorest possible tactic. The GCPD officers who drew weapons (most did not) had just gotten back from SWAT training and were eager to show off their new skills. Nice try.

These civil servants should have their pistols taken away from them when on duty in case their aim is any better than their judgment.

And they knew that before the raid?

87 posted on 07/07/2004 5:45:03 AM PDT by Salo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Salo
They had a report of a weapon. A drug dealer with a weapon was a possibility.

If they had expected weapons, then all 15 would have drawn their guns instead of two or three holding their guns at the ready.

"Storming" a suspect with overwhelming force is the best way to prevent the suspect from even thinking about using a weapon.

88 posted on 07/07/2004 6:34:57 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
They did not. There was a rumor of a weapon being on campus days before this raid took place - an unrelated incident. No weapons were ever found.

They had a report of a weapon.

Not in a crowd of children, it isn't.

"Storming" a suspect with overwhelming force is the best way to prevent the suspect from even thinking about using a weapon.

89 posted on 07/07/2004 7:16:24 PM PDT by Salo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Salo

You are posting to a stone JBT apologist.

The man is impermeable.


90 posted on 07/07/2004 7:24:18 PM PDT by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
"You are posting to a stone JBT apologist believer in law and order.

The cops did nothing illegal. Did you read the article? Can you read? N-O-T-H-I-N-G I-L-L-E-G-A-L.

Absolutely amazing -- the drug behavior you'll tolerate and defend, all because you want your precious recreational drugs to be legal. What a selfish and irresponsible attitude.

91 posted on 07/08/2004 6:18:23 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
N-O-T-H-I-N-G I-L-L-E-G-A-L.

Like villains in an old movie, they done it all 'nice and legal'.

You crack me up!

92 posted on 07/08/2004 6:24:38 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson