Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Said to Return Saudi Suspects in Secret Deal, NYT Reports
Bloomberg ^ | 7/3/04 | Jennifer Itzenson

Posted on 07/03/2004 2:02:13 PM PDT by wagglebee

July 3 (Bloomberg) -- Five suspected terrorists were released from the U.S. naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and returned to Saudi Arabia as part of a secret agreement last year, the New York Times reported, citing unidentified senior U.S. and U.K. officials.

In return, Saudi Arabia released five U.K. citizens and two others who had been convicted of terrorist strikes in Saudi Arabia, the newspaper reported on its Web site in a story to be published in tomorrow's edition. U.K. diplomats said the men had likely given false confessions after being tortured by Saudi security police officers, the newspaper reported.

Pentagon, Central Intelligence Agency and Justice Department officials at first objected to the transfer of the Saudi suspects, who they said were possibly too great of a threat to be released from U.S. custody, the Times reported, citing unidentified officials involved in the deliberations. The deal helped satisfy important allies as the U.S. invaded Iraq, the paper said.

``There is no recollection here of any linkage between these two actions,'' Sean McCormick, a spokesman for the National Security Council, told the Times. He denied that the Saudi detainees were transferred in exchange for the U.K. prisoners. He said the return of the Saudis was ``part of the normal policy of transferring detainees from Guantanamo for prosecution or continued detention.''


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: enemycombatant; gitmo; saudiarabia; sauditerrorists
This doesn't make sense to me at all.
1 posted on 07/03/2004 2:02:14 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
`There is no recollection here of any linkage between these two actions,''

This guy has seen one too many Tom Clancy movies.

2 posted on 07/03/2004 2:06:31 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Significance. What's the significance of this? Anybody? Anybody?


3 posted on 07/03/2004 2:11:38 PM PDT by Clara Lou (Hillary Clinton: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
This doesn't make sense to me at all.

Nor me . . . consider the source. The Slimes will print a retraction on page 103 of the Want Ads soon.

If one is looking for truth in the written media . . . you'd have better luck reading the National Enquirer. Hey! Why couldn't that Egyptian woman have given birth to a four-headed camel? Pee Wee Clinton, supposedly, came from a Homo Sapiens. It coulda happened.

4 posted on 07/03/2004 2:12:07 PM PDT by geedee (Has anyone ever seen Lurch and Jane Hathaway in the same room?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"In return, Saudi Arabia released five U.K. citizens and two others who had been convicted of terrorist strikes in Saudi Arabia, the newspaper reported on its Web site in a story to be published in tomorrow's edition. U.K. diplomats said the men had likely given false confessions after being tortured by Saudi security police officers, the newspaper reported. "

I remembeber these guys being released. It probably happened.

5 posted on 07/03/2004 2:30:45 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Another attempt by the Slimes to make the Bush administration look soft on terrorism.

Won't work; we would not have let these guys go if they were truly valuable.

This is smoke, and the Slimes hope it'll catch fire.

6 posted on 07/03/2004 2:54:08 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; wagglebee; Mitchell; swarthyguy

Those Brits could be those fellows accused of terrorist related alcohol bootlegging.

No one really believed that story, many thought the bombings were Islamists, the foreigners framed up.


7 posted on 07/03/2004 3:36:46 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

All the old gay lady has to do is put the headline out there and that is what gets read. Most people only read the head line. This makes the administration look bad, like an Iran Contra secret. Those of us who read the article say so damn what.


8 posted on 07/03/2004 5:19:28 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (it's coming and if you don't get off the tracks it will run you down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy

you're gonna want to see this....


9 posted on 07/03/2004 6:20:53 PM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson