Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
More to the point, what is the canonical status of this latest "consensus"?

Bishops are free to refuse, or not refuse.

28 posted on 07/03/2004 9:16:36 AM PDT by sinkspur (There's no problem on the inside of a kid that the outside of a dog can't cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur

How does that compare to the canonical status of Ratzinger's clarification? Can a bishop say anything he wants and that's right...i.e., that is the authentic Catholic teaching? Sigerian double-truth theory.


30 posted on 07/03/2004 9:18:48 AM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
Jesuitical answer: It's prudential judgment on a policy of sacramental discipline.
31 posted on 07/03/2004 9:19:50 AM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
Bishops are free to refuse, or not refuse.

Yes, that is their consensus.

But its also open schism.

The question was, "what is the canonical status of this latest "consensus"?

Canonically, it is an openly schismatic and defiant act, no better than any trad schismatic.

32 posted on 07/03/2004 9:20:30 AM PDT by Polycarp IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson