AP Correction: Clintons - San Francisco Story (Hillary's Marxist Speech)

http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/mld/ledgerenquirer/news/nation/9067245.htm ^ | Friday, July 2, 2004

[Lancey Howard]

Communism is communism is communism is communism.....
Adding the vague weasel-words "fiscally responsible" does not change Hillary Clinton's meaning one iota.

[oblomov]

>>silimarity of today's market to the October 1987 market.


I believe that the market is going to be manipulated this Summer and Fall by the likes of Soros/Buffet in order to throw the election to Kerry.

[getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL]

How do you tell a Communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
Ronald Reagan -Remarks in Arlington, Virginia, September 25, 1987

[YaYa123]

Bottom Line:

"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.'"

[Just mythoughts]

"I believe that the market is going to be manipulated this Summer and Fall by the likes of Soros/Buffet in order to throw the election to Kerry."


While everyone was laughing about Hillry's shrill in CT, about a Bush economy was one and same as "Hoover economy", I took it as a WARNING to her good buddies to prepare.

The women has not left the "economy" topic for very long and Soros himself if he could, in a heartbeat would pull a stunt to create a "hoover economy".

I also recall Hillry and an October surprise being written about, not that it was specific to the "economy".

I have tucked all these little clues and today when there was this person on claiming the similarities to October 1987 and Hillry's latest rant, did not seem to be a coincidence.

Whether they can pull it off is beyond my abilities, however, it fits the pattern of "whatever it takes" to regain power.

[YaYa123]

Since way back last summer, I was right about Kerry being the democrats' nominee, I'm right about Hillary not being his running mate, and I boldly predict it will be a Kerry - Gebhardt ticket.

Just for the record: First of all, democrats and Bush haters will vote for Kerry no matter who he chooses as his running mate.

The Clintons don't want Edwards on the ticket, so he won't be there.

Gebhardt dropped out early and gracefully, caused the Kerry campaign no grief, they get along, and Kerry can sell Gebhardt as most qualified to be president should something happen to him.

The reason Kerry is announcing this on the internet is to muffle the criticism, and soften the disappointment of all the Edwards supporters with some cutesy pie .com theatrics.

And about Hillary's socialistic coming out comment? She's just re-establishing her ties to the far left wing of the party.

[oblomov]

As it has been pointed out many times, it takes just a small amount of money (relative to its nominal size) to manipulate the equity market. One need only have deep pockets, and be an aggressive seller of equity futures or equity futures options to move the market significantly. The timing of this manipulation is critical. The question is, whether displacing the market this way can be sustained. Also, I'm sure that there are forces on the other side that will try to stabilize the market between now and November. I also think that a terrorist attack may come through the financial markets. In this case, Soros and Al Qaeda would be working in concert to defeat Bush, as well as polarize the "investor class" against capitalist institutions. I'm not implying that they are conspiring, just that they have similar goals and might use the same methods. But, on the other hand, remember this crash that never was?

[FairOpinion]

The "correction" is really a confirmation that she DID say it:

"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.'"

How is adding, that the government will use the money they take away from you "for the common good" "responsibly", change the fact that they DO want to take it away from you, for the "common good".

If a mugger stops you on the street and demands you give him all your money, but also assures you, that he will be "fiscally responsible" with it, will that make you feel any better, will that make his acts any less illegal?

[Brad’s Gramma]

Oh for Pete's sake...BTTT

[Just mythoughts]

"As it has been pointed out many times, it takes just a small amount of money (relative to its nominal size) to manipulate the equity market. One need only have deep pockets, and be an aggressive seller of equity futures or equity futures options to move the market significantly. The timing of this manipulation is critical. The question is, whether displacing the market this way can be sustained. Also, I'm sure that there are forces on the other side that will try to stabilize the market between now and November. I also think that a terrorist attack may come through the financial markets. In this case, Soros and Al Qaeda would be working in concert to defeat Bush, as well as polarize the "investor class" against capitalist institutions. I'm not implying that they are conspiring, just that they have similar goals and might use the same methods. But, on the other hand, remember this crash that never was?"


I completely agree.

Hillry is a manipulator of all things to her benefit. How successful or damaging she will be is the question.

Hillry sat atop the world for 8 years as co-president and her goal is to regain that position all to herself, "whatever it takes".

[zip]

ping