To: truthandlife
On Friday, Land said: "It's one thing for a church member motivated by exhortations to exercise his Christian citizenship to go out and decide to work on the Bush campaign or the Kerry campaign. It's another and totally inappropriate thing for a political campaign to ask workers who may be church members to provide church member information through the use of directories to solicit partisan support."
Poppycock!
2 posted on
07/03/2004 7:10:06 AM PDT by
Conspiracy Guy
(Monthly donors make it happen. Become a happening Freeper today!)
To: truthandlife
Yeah right, BAPTIST-DEMOCRATS angry at Bush; and that is all I'm going to say- you make the connection.
4 posted on
07/03/2004 7:13:56 AM PDT by
Porterville
(Fight Communism, vote Republican- and piss on france)
To: truthandlife
"I suspect that this will rub a lot of pastors' fur the wrong way."
Shocked this morning to find out my pastor has fur.
ww
9 posted on
07/03/2004 7:35:03 AM PDT by
worrywart
To: truthandlife
Many black churches are extremely involved in politics. How many times have I seen the Rev Jackson speaking at churches? Of course, nothing he said or did had any political slant to it. He was just preaching.
10 posted on
07/03/2004 7:36:16 AM PDT by
saleman
To: truthandlife
Didn't Kerry rally the AME (African, Methodist, Episcopal) church awhile back? The glaring double-standard that democrats enjoy - openly campaigning at liberal black churches, homosexual churches and the handful of mainstream denomination churches that have slipped into heresy, and if a Republican so much as attends a national conference, Barry Lynn is out to scream separation of Church and state. The funny thing is, most media folks know so little about christianity that they REALLY believe these liberal religious folks represent the body of Christianity. Hillary campaigning from a Catholic pulpit, Clinton campaigning from liberal Baptist churches - never received any reprimand.
Democrats = Abortion, Gay marriage, homosexual rights, government controlled medical care, and taking money from the middle-class to subsidize the lower-class... for the greater good.
To: truthandlife
Other religious organizations also criticized the document as inappropriate, suggesting that it could jeopardize churches' tax-exempt status by involving them in partisan politics. If you're gonna try to enforce that, it damn well better go both ways.
20 posted on
07/03/2004 7:56:31 AM PDT by
atomicpossum
(I give up! Entropy, you win!)
To: truthandlife
Frankly, I don't see what the problem is. Churches can decline to do so. Other churches might put it on their bulletin boards.
31 posted on
07/03/2004 8:40:21 AM PDT by
Alia
To: truthandlife
Is this comedy?
Democrats have been campaigning from the puplit as long as I've been alive and whats more I could care less.
33 posted on
07/03/2004 9:00:40 AM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: truthandlife
More Baptist self-contradicting church/state separation/political activism nonsense...
To: truthandlife
Dear Dr. Land,
When Barry Lynn agrees with you, you're wrong.
39 posted on
07/03/2004 9:26:49 AM PDT by
curtking
("Being in front of a camera may make you famous, but it doesn't make you more intelligent.")
To: truthandlife
Get over it, whiny Baptists.
53 posted on
07/03/2004 12:51:16 PM PDT by
Coop
(Freedom isn't free)
To: truthandlife
[The Rev. Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said the effort "is a shameless attempt to misuse and abuse churches for partisan political ends." Lynn said his organization would be "watching closely to see how this plays out in the pews."
The Rev. Welton Gaddy, president of the Interfaith Alliance, a Washington advocacy group that has been critical of the Christian right, said the document was "totally inappropriate."]
I am waiting for these Commies to condemn RATS campaigning in liberal churches.
64 posted on
07/03/2004 7:30:35 PM PDT by
Kuksool
(Get your souls to the polls in November)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson