Posted on 07/02/2004 5:27:53 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch
- Ens. Manuel Sanchez, VX-30 maintenance material control officer, recently made history by being the last Navy F-14 Tomcat test and evaluation maintenance material control officer. According to tradition, Sanchez took a supersonic ride in the back of the F-14 Tomcat which he said was the time of his life.
If you havent heard, the world famous Tomcat that Tom Cruise put on the map with the movie Top Gun is currently disestablishing from the Navy, Sanchez said. We at Air Test and Evaluation Squadron Three Zero (VX-30) The Bloodhounds out of Point Mugu, Calif., are a Combat Support Unit. The Bloodhounds exist to carry out missions in support of our naval war fighters. These missions consist of providing our naval war fighters with system improvements that enhance their ability to put missiles in enemy cockpits and strike weapons through their front doors.
We do this by conducting and supporting cutting edge research, development, test and evaluation (RDT&E) flight tests of naval combat systems, Sanchez continued. To accomplish these missions, we provide Naval Air Systems Command with people and aircraft that contribute both unique and complementary RDT&E capabilities to our winning team. However, since the Tomcat squadrons will be going away by midyear 2006, the requirements to continue research and tests of advanced weapons and systems for the F-14 Tomcat is no longer a demand.
The Navys heart and soul for fighter aircraft is now the Strike Fighter F/A-18 Hornet which is currently used by the world famous Navy Blue Angels, Sanchez said.
Sanchez joined the Navy out of Beeville in May 1990 as an enlisted sailor and was commissioned as an officer in December 2002. He is the son of Abel and Esther Rodriguez of Beeville. He will leave Point Mugu for VFA-27 Royal Maces (F/A-18E Super Hornet Squadron) out of Atsugi, Japan, in April 2005.
Ive had an awesome tour here at Point Mugu as you can tell by a couple of these photos, Sanchez said. I gave actor Jamie Foxx a tour of my squadron and had him sit in the Tomcat. He wanted to get the feel of sitting in a jet as he was filming for his upcoming movie Stealth. Also, I participated in President Ronald Reagans funeral. Being away from home, I sincerely enjoy going online (to read the newspaper) and keeping up with Beeville every Wednesday and Saturday. You guys do a phenomenal job!
We are gambling on the notion that we can get by until the F-22 (Naval Version) comes along with the F-18E/F
However, the F-18E/F cannot compete with the SU-27, SU-35's that are out there in China, India as well as N. Korea.
While our pilots are better trained it is the first time in history we are putting them out there with inferior aircraft - (within certain terms) -
Congress blew it on this one going with the F-18E/F for price alone -
F-14D is by far the superior Air to Air platform for fleet defense -
It will be a cold day in hell before the AF takes a Navy jet again. I've heard stories about the AF thinking Thuds were all they would need in Vietnam. Eagle-E is a weird bird anyway. It takes a lot of compromise to make that fat baby fly with all the new guts and conformals. I don't think other aircraft would be so different. Where can I get one of those cool scarfs so I can look AF-cool? Maybe a white and blue checkered one?
After reading my post...I was kind of directing those as questions to you - (Since you are by far more in the know)...more just asking if all those points were true (or not).
But I worded it wrong.
Seems like such a dangerous decision by our Congress -
What plane is going to be the "real" replacement for the Tomcats down the road??
Truthfully, I have no idea.
I am hoping and lobbying for a Navy version of the YF-23. Not only is it an incredible aircraft, I would love for the Navy to have a jet that would also whip the F-22. It would be great for both services to revive true inter-service competition. The Navy knows that ultimately, they need a big, bad-ass jet and not some gutless insect of an airplane protecting the fleet. The YF-23 even LOOKS like a navy jet, just a mean looking mutha that looks scary just sitting on the tarmac.
Why?
To be the best, thats why.
In the rain, in the dark, with no gas, I know I can put it down to an OK-3 anytime, baby.
I don't need no stinkin' 10,000ft runway(or a gomer scarf) to look good. Besides that, you aint got no steaks and sliders waiting for you when you land, your coffee sucks worse than ours does, and only ugly chicks live near AF bases and they are waiting for you at the gate with a chicken, a goat, and an application for Rent-A-Center.
Haha...I know, right!
I agree. That's the most beautiful bird ever. From what I understand [though I've never been given a breakdown] it beat out the F22 across the board. I so hope it finds a place in one of our branches. It would be a shame to have it just fade out. It'd be a great carrier born air supremacy fighter/interceptor.
Though I dont know how much retooling would have to be done in order to make it seaworthy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.