See #37. Another point that is more interesting than his annulment (although it was crass of him to inform his exwife that way)is the story told by Terr-ray-zuh that he wakes up screaming in the middle of the night and has for years, according to his daughters.
I want to know more about that!
Concernig his annulment, the only thing we should be concerned about is whether he actually has one. No date has been published, as far as I know. I heard that it was not ready at the time of his marriage to Terr-ray-zuh.
So -- were they married in the Catholic Church? I think they were married elsewhere, but I've forgotten the details. Were they EVER married in the Church? After the whole annulment thing was strightened out.
THAT is the really interesting point, because -- if not, it is really putting him in an awkward position in regard to receiving Communion.
In any case, his daughters are NOT illegitimate. A church annulment has nothing to do with the legitimacy of the offspring. It is not the same thing as a civil annulment.
At least in our state, even if the civil marriage is annulled (usually because of bigamy or because they were married before six months has elapsed from the date of divorce), the legitimacy of the children is unaffected. The law concerning civil annullment in other states may strip legitimacy away from the children of the marriage, but it's not something I'm going to research.