You can just call me Sir.
Misrepresentation and false accusations are part and parcel of your chosen gang, and when, through your ignorance and theirs you get something wrong you never hesitate from beating it to death hoping somewhere along the line one more brain dead partisan will believe it.
You do it with some of the folks here to absurd lengths and their tolerance for your presence boggles the mind. I admire their patience and fortitude in standing up to your unreasoned hate.
There are plenty of pluguglies on every forum on the internet and yet your gang insists on going after the folks who matter, and if you can't come up with something meaty you just call everyone else a kook and get your jollies. I don't know any kooks personally, and don't subscribe to the idea that someone with a different view is ignorant or deserving of ridicule. I do know envious little wretches like you and the hamsters who can't stand to see anything blossom without your blessing.
Your blessing would be the kiss of death to any reasoned man.
Just exactly WHY should I care what you think, and being at more than one forum (including my OWN) is supposed to be some kind of heresy or what?
You spend most of your time rephrasing what others say on other sites and heresy isn't the term I use to describe jerks who are afraid to use their established name.
How many forums have YOU been on? I seem to remember Reunion and your getting BANNED at edging Right, what else?
I try to join as many as I discover that might be used by twits like you who register with my screen name or some derivitive of it. I fight my battles on site now that the mochajokes of the internet have been excluded from FR and LP.
I don't consider Sabertooth and anti-Freeper by a long shot, nor am I.
You diminish this site by taking cheap shots at those you consider to be the source of amusement for your maggot infested hamster buddies. Both of you have personal agendas and disputes with individual posters or ideas, and when whacked for it go off site to get rewarded for your noble cause.
You both choose to belabour the point by incessant ranting and enjoy going off site to revive your incentives. Gossiping about other sites doesn't seem to be exactly a friendly way to act.
And, before you compare yourself to those of us who objected to the 'coven' off site, bear in mind who that coven was and is most representative of.
I AM, however, anti-BLOWHARDS, like yourself, and I... find nothing more cowardly then your proven Walter Mitty posts over the years showing tremendous character problems.
Aside from the obvious fact that you haven't a clue what a Walter Mitty character is actually about, you and your clones need to come up with better excuses for dramatizing your envy, jealousy and impotence.
That said, other than a derisive lol directed to Bob J, do you have anything to say regarding the interview, now that you've taken the time to criticize me for interjecting some level of coolant to the flames coming from 'toot and shoot?