Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam 'didn't expect invasion'
The Evening Standard ^ | July 2, 2004 | Staff

Posted on 07/02/2004 5:00:09 AM PDT by MadIvan

Saddam Hussein believed that Iraq would never be invaded because the US would get bogged down in "interminable debate at the UN", his interrogators believe.

The ousted dictator thought that the uncertainty about his weapons arsenal would prevent his neighbours from invading, while the US would be stuck in negotiations about launching an attack an intelligence official claimed.

Although the interrogations of Saddam have yielded little about whether he recently possessed weapons of mass destruction, they have provided a fascinating insight into aspects of his life and leadership.

During interrogation sessions, Saddam suggested that he ordered the 1990 invasion of Kuwait to keep his army busy.

He appeared to fear giving officers too much time without being occupied by combat.

An intelligence official also told the newspaper that interrogators believe Saddam was shocked when the coalition attacked and then invaded Iraq in March last year.

The officials said Saddam believed that ambiguity about his weapons programmes "would keep the neighbours at bay, while the US would be hung up in interminable debate at the UN".

During one session he appeared to boast that he had infiltrated the Iraqi National Congress, the exile organisation which pressed for the invasion of Iraq.

While there were no physical methods of coercion used, psychological tactics were employed.

Sometimes, the interrogator would try to catch Saddam out by questioning him for hours, and then leaving him alone for a period of time before returning to ask just one more question.

In one session Saddam told how his son Uday had beaten to death someone who had annoyed him by playing music too loudly.

Saddam said he had Uday imprisoned in solitary confinement as punishment.

It has been widely reported that Uday bludgeoned to death his father's valet and food taster in 1988, apparently because he had introduced Saddam to the woman who became his mistress.

Despite the insights, Saddam gave little away during interrogation which would incriminate him in his trial for crimes against humanity, including genocide.

"We got very little, I would say almost nothing," said an official who served with the occupation authority.

Saddam was initially in the hands of the CIA but when it became clear he would not co-operate with them, the FBI took a greater role in questioning him, the New York Times reported.

For much of his detention Saddam's guards were reservists from Puerto Rico, who were ordered to speak only Spanish in his presence.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: invasion; iraq; saddam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
Obviously Saddam is an idiot. Anyone who truly understood "El Hombre Tejas" and the Prime Minister would have realised - the game was up.

Syphillitic goat shagging old fool that he is - it's hard to believe he was actually in charge of anything in particular.

Regards, Ivan


1 posted on 07/02/2004 5:00:09 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KangarooJacqui; Happygal; lainde; Denver Ditdat; Judith Anne; Desdemona; alnick; knews_hound; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 07/02/2004 5:01:10 AM PDT by MadIvan (Ronald Reagan - proof positive that one man can change the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
because the US would get bogged down in "interminable debate at the UN

Who says Saddam's bribes to the french & germans didn't buy him any information?

3 posted on 07/02/2004 5:02:32 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Interminable U.N. debate = the Kerry plan/solution to all foreign policy matters.


4 posted on 07/02/2004 5:02:39 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
The officials said Saddam believed that ambiguity about his weapons programmes "would keep the neighbours at bay, while the US would be hung up in interminable debate at the UN".

I'm sure most thug dictators see the UN as a useful means to hogtie any efforts to thwart their regime. The UN - a dictator's best friend.

5 posted on 07/02/2004 5:06:41 AM PDT by tdadams (If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Your Prime Minister is like Wiston Churchill. If he run for the re-election, I hope he wins, in spite of being Laborist.


6 posted on 07/02/2004 5:07:26 AM PDT by Reader of news
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

He was spoiled. The UN and Billy Boy danced to his tune so long, that he lost sight of a few things. Namely, that people over here are people of their word.


7 posted on 07/02/2004 5:08:14 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
FLASHBACKS

Dan Rather: "Mr. President, if only you knew how
much I and others at CBS support, worship, and kneel to you.
We will NEVER let American forces hurt you. We will coverup all your atrocities. Do not fear.
CBS is with you, Mr. President. Forever. Long live all tyrants."

Terrorist-Murderer Saddam: "Mr, Rather, it is absolutely remarkable that you media girly men
will repeatedly betray your own country, your own President, and even the free American people during war.
Do you realize, Mr. Rather, that for millions of Iraqis and my captives
I had to gang rape each man's child and his wife and often him,
and then burn them each in nitric acid, and then mutilate them by cutting off at least an ear,
and then force them to watch me push their children through a paper shredder
to get a fraction of your obedience and loyalty.
Mr. Rather, I used to have to remove two testicles and two arms before we have every seen such betrayal as yours.
But you and CBS, grovel to me ...... ..... for ..... for nothing.
Thank you, Mr. Rather.
Thank you. We, terrorists, al Qaeda, and Baathists worldwide."

8 posted on 07/02/2004 5:10:49 AM PDT by Diogenesis (We do only what we are meant to do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Saddam 'didn't expect the US invasion.'

Nobody expects the US Invasion!!

Sorry, I have watched entirely to much Monty Python in my life.

9 posted on 07/02/2004 5:10:58 AM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Now I can say something. In Feburary of 2003 at late night telephone ring, it was for my husband. After he finish he said "America is ready, sadam is finished I need to leave". Later did I find out what happened that day.
Polish Grom, America special forces with British were already moving. By one shot Grom moved with stealth and breath taking attack that took Irak soldiers of guard. It was so fast and so well that made Irak soldiers to put gun down. Many stories can not be say, but good one are good to let know. Precision was perfect.


10 posted on 07/02/2004 5:11:47 AM PDT by anonymoussierra (Grom - thunder and lightning - long live Poland -greetings to Ameryka our ally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
He was spoiled. The UN and Billy Boy danced to his tune so long, that he lost sight of a few things.

Almost - he had bought off so many at the UN he EXPECTED his minions to create the QUAGMIRE.

Bush don't play that game. History will credit him with taking risks that Klintoon feigned from.

11 posted on 07/02/2004 5:13:02 AM PDT by corkoman (Logged in - have you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Our chief weapon is surprise, surprise and fear and ruthless efficiency...our three weapons are fear, surprise, ruthless efficiency and a fanatical devotion to the Pope...

You're not alone in your condition. ;)

Regards, Ivan

12 posted on 07/02/2004 5:13:13 AM PDT by MadIvan (Ronald Reagan - proof positive that one man can change the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

That was my first thought, too!

The question is...

Will the Iraqis use The Comfy Chair on Saddam?


13 posted on 07/02/2004 5:17:41 AM PDT by Poohbah ("Mister Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!" -- President Ronald Reagan, Berlin, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Will the Iraqis use The Comfy Chair on Saddam?

After the soft cushions. ;)

Regards, Ivan

14 posted on 07/02/2004 5:18:54 AM PDT by MadIvan (Ronald Reagan - proof positive that one man can change the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
For much of his detention Saddam's guards were reservists from Puerto Rico, who were ordered to speak only Spanish in his presence.

;-)

15 posted on 07/02/2004 5:19:37 AM PDT by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

'While there were no physical methods of coercion used, psychological tactics were employed.
Sometimes, the interrogator would try to catch Saddam out by questioning him for hours, and then leaving him alone for a period of time before returning to ask just one more question'

OOOOOOOoooohhhhhhhhh, someone's gonna get it......not the "one more question" torture!


16 posted on 07/02/2004 5:20:54 AM PDT by bitt (Kerry's PRESENT is enough for me not to vote for him, let alone his PAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LadyDoc

Well, I am sure the more Hispanophobic members of FR now view Saddam as their drinking buddy...


17 posted on 07/02/2004 5:21:03 AM PDT by Poohbah ("Mister Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!" -- President Ronald Reagan, Berlin, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I'm reading an VERY interesting book "The FRENCH BETRAYAL of AMERICA" by Kenneth Timmerman.

It is no wonder that Saddam thought that France could "contain" the USA at the UN. His very close retaionship to French leaders goes all the way back to the Carter admin years. Timmerman has terrific sources and the connections are eye-popping.

18 posted on 07/02/2004 5:22:35 AM PDT by maica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
It's like having the feathers of the soft cushions all at one end. ;)

Regards, Ivan

19 posted on 07/02/2004 5:22:48 AM PDT by MadIvan (Ronald Reagan - proof positive that one man can change the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All

He thought no president would have the guts to invade a country in the Mid-East. He thought wrong.


20 posted on 07/02/2004 5:23:17 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye ((Kerry is a flake))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson