Posted on 07/02/2004 2:20:17 AM PDT by Happy2BMe
>> Hillary will bring in the far-left Nader crowd.
_______________________________________ Check.
Plus, think about the throngs of women who won't be able to resist voting for a female (simply for that and that reason alone) as the #2 in the White House.
I'll bet there will be some heavy conversations going on in the top GOP circles in the next few days ahead.
Please don't get me wrong. I admire and respect Dick Cheney very much and have complete confidence in his ability to lead.
I do not however believe his credentials alone will be enough to counterbalance the weight of what Hillary will pull in from the various minority and borderline groups I've mentioned.
Anybody come up with a good name yet in case Bush decides to counter Hillary's bid?
It would be great if Kerry did the announcement today - just to end all the Hillary speculation. My money is on Edwards.
When did Morris say it wouldn't be Hillary. It had to be just in the past 24 hours.
I'm not going to discuss the merits of the cynical politcal calculatons on whetyehr or not to displace Cheney...but would only add why waste all the time NOT taking President Bush at his word.. He announced LAST year that Cheney would again be on the ticket..he affirmed it two months ago..He does what he says..case closed..
I hope it is Hillary but I doubt it. I suspect it will be Edwards.
Quite often he projects with 100% accuracy.
If it were going to be Edwards, that would be no surprise at all. Edwards has been the logical selection all along.
Even to George W. Bush.
Case is still open.
Hillary's power will wane too much in four more years to be nominated, and she knows it. She is going for it in 2004.
to paraphrase our president..words must have meaning, and consequences....and for all those "friends" of BUsh..the liberal media..who are constantly runing this up the flagpole and hoping that some salute it: were Bush to drop Cheney, for whomever..ALL the articles for the convention, would say how cynical, how political, Bush was in tossing his closest advisor overboard...helll, they'd probably file a lawsuit agaist him under the ADA, sayig that Bush discriminated against Cheney becauise of his heart condition....I'm mean..if a 400 Lb guy has the right to be a subway conductor in NYC under the ADA, then a guy with a stent had the right to be VP..
Morris doesn't close to projecting with 100% accuracy. You sound like a complete plant. Bush is not, will not, and should not replace Cheney with anyone else...despite your empty statements.
yawning . .
She has achieved further gains due to the fact that the leftist base in this country is composed of educated fools.
You, I feel certain, don't have doubts about your sanity and neither do I. Since we are two such great conservative intellects, how can we conceive of these Klintons being elected and reelected in the state of Arkancide, the propulsion of the Klinton duo to eight evil years in the WH, and by la Hitlery's election by New Yarkansas voters to the senate?
If we can see what this marxist philosophy has done to destroy our nation, why can't the others look down the road, then behind them to see what evil socialism has wrought?
No. I stand by my statement. Hitlery and all the Klintonista sycophants are simpletons!
Hitlery, I believe, (and Billy-Goat) was selected by the USSR years ago to undermine our nation. When the USSR became disjointed the PRC moved in to pick up the option. What happened in Arkancide to the Worthen Bank, for example, during Klinton's reign was proof positive. But they needed the stupid voters to continue their mission of self-aggrandizement.
Puppets are brainless. The Klintons are brainless.
You're making a big mistake.
BUMP. Great video.
It's quite clear you have an agenda and that you can't back that agenda with factual information. Heck, you can't even back it up with circumstantial information.
"If Kerry had half a brain in his head, he would find some way to bend the rules on age to get Harold Ford of Tennessee. I realise not everyone believes me on this, but the man is frighteningly similar to Tony Blair, circa 1983."
Kerry or Ford is similar to Blari in 1983?
Do you think BUsh will be defeated?
Blair is a liberal and I certainly don't agree with his domestic policies like the ones on guns, but he was dead right on the Iraqis and he recognizes the fact that the West is at war with Islam - that this is really WW3.
Applauding. Loudly.
Good one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.