Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: twigs

Okay, if the character questions don't bug you, how about security considerations? To my mind, any candidate with something to hide is a national security risk.


43 posted on 07/02/2004 10:55:41 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: mewzilla

The character issues DO bother me. But whatever I need to know about that is already out there. I find it plenty troublesome that he left a depressed wife and that he has a history of marrying for money. I don't need the unsealing of these documents to know that though. Everyone has personal issues that they don't want to divulge in a public campaign. So I guess everyone with a personal life is a national security risk? So if Pres. Bush's DUI had not been revealed he would have been a nat. sec. risk? I think some things DO constitute that--but not personal divorce papers. If there is something in personal issues that rise to the level of illegality, then I agree with you.


44 posted on 07/02/2004 11:08:31 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson