Replies

I don't think the statements condemning IslamoFascisim are that rare, they are just not news. Sort of like any Christian and / or pro-life group condemning violence against abortionists and clinics. They are not news (and don't serve the press' agenda).

Since the Saudis FUND the Wahabbis, I would say they should be a target nation... Again, Pres. Bush's biggest failure is his "Islam is a religion of peace" statement. And the Wahabbi's are the folks I'm comparing to the CotC. As you pointed out, they are are lot more prevalent, though, with entire nations under their sway. And, because the Saudis subsidize them,they have money to spread their hate.

Europe is a goner, at least the assourted "little countries," France, Germany and probably the UK. Maybe the Poles can hold the line. We should have supported Serbia simply on the basis that they were not Muslims...

. We have our own, similar, problems with South and Central America. The barbarians are invading but we don't have the guts to call 'em such and run them off. The Romans had this trouble with Teutons, too.

Can't disagree with you on too much here. As for Saudi Arabia, the royal family is paying off the Wahabbis to stay in power. I don't want to think of what that part of the world would be like with Saudi Arabia under bin Laden. This is one of the countries you hold your nose and try and keep a Western acceptance. Assuming SA falls, it will the beginning of the Islamic empire, which will shortly include Syria and Iran. Iraq is all the more important at that point, because if it falls too, Pakistan will not be far behind.