Posted on 06/30/2004 4:32:31 PM PDT by thinkahead
Laura, Karen, Ann, Lynne, Condi, Katherine - they're successful professors, lawyers, librarians and novelists. They have minds of their own. Yet, they unquestioningly support President Bush even as he robs women of the right to make private decisions about their personal lives. Even worse, theyre masking Bushs record of restricting womens rights convincing women across the country to vote for Bush in November.
You're not the only one who finds this disturbing... and you can be part of the growing number of Americans who are ready to do something about it.
Imagine what President Bush will be able to restrict, what choices he'll take away, if any more of us let our ideals of women's rights and equality take a back seat to his ideology. A lot can happen in four years enough to take our right to choose away completely. Help us elect the only president who will fight for a country where we're entitled to think, question, express our views, and make our own private decisions... John Kerry.
Sign in through the box below to say I'M NO CRAWFORD WIFE. You'll get your FREE Crawford Wives poster and find out how to make a difference in the elections this November...
This site needs a good ole' fashioned freeping....
http://www.bushvchoice.com/trailer/home.html
Every Freeper needs to peruse this site, and "double-click" for awhile...
Heh..heh...
yeah, maybe just use the email addy: f*cknaral@yahoo.com like I did, maybe they'll get the point
Hmmm, wouldn't it be better to just ignore them? I have enough spam in my inbox. I am itching to congratulate them on assembling such a lovely group of real ladies, though ;-)
These are the role models I want for my little girl...
Yeah, you are right..but these NARAL types get my gander up...weak spot...LOL
I went to the NARAL website and found the "contact us" link. I completed it with some comments that will make some poor employee roll their eyes. But, I think its important that we continue to bombard them with the reality that people don't believe their evil agenda and lies. Enough freepers to their e-mail contact site and they will have to shut it down.
Maybe they could share the details of why it isn't a life? Or is it okay if it falls on the shabby side of "the quality of life"?
Children have rights too. That takes a back seat to their own ideology.
With thanks...:0)
http://www.bushvchoice.com/trailer/index.html
Lol, NARAL isn't doing themselves any favors. They used to get on my last nerve, but I dismiss them as the bitter women that they are...
I wonder if that poster could be worth something someday????
See #11. That actually is a very cool poster. I'm too lazy to create a dummy email account. I wonder if they would send it by snail mail? It would look good framed ;-)
LMAO, I just got a wicked thought...a similar poster featuring John Kerry, Helen Thomas, Maureen Dowd, Hillary, Janet, Maxine, and all the rest of the screech owls on the left!
Check out this thread, Registered!
Why not just donate $0.02 to them. It has to cost you at least $0.10 for each transaction from a credit card ACH and they lose $0.08 a donation as well as cluttering up their finances.
Great Idea! Did you try it?
I'm afraid that the Independent Women's Forum may have given them the idea (inadvertantly)
http://www.iwf.org/inkwell/default.asp?archiveID=580
http://www.iwf.org/inkwell/default.asp?archiveID=574
Anything I would really like to say about the Femaliban would get this post pulled, and me possibly banned. Let's just suffice it to say that this is rich coming from a group of bitter old ugly hags who are still getting mileage out of their kneepads.
Ironic that they chose these women for the poster. Condi is pro-choice, and I've also heard that Laura Bush is too.
I still can't figure out why NARAL included their ideologically soul sister, Condi, in this group since she is pro-abortion.
First, they are criticizing her for supporting the President. If you read the article, you might be able to figure that out.
Second, she is not "pro-abortion." She is pro-choice. Just because she doesn't want something to be illegal doesn't mean she favors it.
Do you want the government to make it illegal for people to get drunk and naked and play the air guitar in the privacy of their own homes? If not, by your logic you must be in favor of naked drunken air guitar. That's depraved, man. You pro-NDAGgers need to get a life.
Condoleezza Rice says that she has examined this issue and come to the conclusion that she doesn't like abortion but outlawing it would not be worth the cost. This doesn't mean she favors baby-killing.
When has President Bush suggested a general ban on abortion? He's done no more than Condi to end abortion in this country. So why pick on her? What does it matter if the National Security Adviser has a divergent opinion on a social issue?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.