1 posted on
06/30/2004 1:35:30 PM PDT by
NukeMan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
To: NukeMan
Now Bush is screwing up the environment and changing the speed of light!
To: NukeMan
A varying speed of light contradicts Einstein's theory of relativity, Maybe not. IIRC, Einstein just postulated that nothing can move faster than the speed of light. Actually he postulated that the speed of light is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion. The rest followed from that assumption.
84 posted on
06/30/2004 2:17:57 PM PDT by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: NukeMan
Can we use this article as proof that the cop's Laser speedtrap was inaccurrate, and therefore unreliable?
107 posted on
06/30/2004 2:34:26 PM PDT by
Itzlzha
(The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote!)
To: mrs tiggywinkle
118 posted on
06/30/2004 2:52:13 PM PDT by
Fidgit
To: NukeMan
global speeding?
(s)Bush's fault(/s)
To: NukeMan
To: NukeMan
"And in March, Flambaum claimed that the ratio of different elements left over from just after the big bang suggests that alpha(s) must have been different then compared with its value today (Physical Review D, vol 69, p 063506)."
Of course, there's that other conclusion...that the Big Bang Theory is simply wrong.
Oh no, lets pretend that the speed of Light is changing rather than throw out our precious Big Bang Theory!
< /SARCASM >
123 posted on
06/30/2004 3:03:53 PM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Thud
To: NukeMan
Speed of light may have changed recently
The speed of light, one of the most sacrosanct of the universal physical constants, may have been lower as recently as two billion years agoI never considered 2 billion years as recent.
131 posted on
06/30/2004 3:25:46 PM PDT by
AndrewC
(I am a Bertrand Russell agnostic, even an atheist.</sarcasm>)
To: farmfriend; blam
132 posted on
06/30/2004 3:37:53 PM PDT by
Thud
To: NukeMan
It's ok. Just wait until light gets it's second wind. Then you will really see something!!!!
134 posted on
06/30/2004 3:55:09 PM PDT by
mcspur
To: NukeMan
I remember telling my wife a few months ago that our flashlights seemed faster.
146 posted on
06/30/2004 5:24:26 PM PDT by
O.C. - Old Cracker
(When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
To: DallasMike; GrandEagle
150 posted on
06/30/2004 5:54:29 PM PDT by
DannyTN
To: NukeMan
If you've seen one angstrom, you've seen them all.
154 posted on
06/30/2004 7:20:00 PM PDT by
Old Professer
(Interests in common are commonly abused.)
To: NukeMan
I guess that explains why I have to press the button on my remote a few times before the channel changes on my TV.
-PJ
To: NukeMan
So the Bible is right again?
To: NukeMan
The speed of light, one of the most sacrosanct of the universal physical constants, may have been lower as recently as two billion years ago - and not in some far corner of the universe, but right here on Earth. Must be global warming... Oh, yeah, caused by the Bush Administration. (hee hee)
To: NukeMan
Nope...it didn't change...just checked it and it's still the same...FAST!
254 posted on
07/02/2004 12:36:49 PM PDT by
Hotdog
To: NukeMan
‘Velly interesting ... but is it practical?’
260 posted on
09/02/2012 11:27:59 AM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Being deceived can be cured.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson