This is pretty coll, you may have seen it already.
Statement Analysis
http://www.statementanalysis.com/speterson/
coll=cool....sheesh!
Interesting Jax. But then we have discussed this a thousand times right. A professional overview is great too. He's completely deceptive in every interview. All his actions are inappropriate. He was calling Amber on the way to the Search center and pretending their was nothing wrong. ??????? Uh Hello!!
Now we have a half day off today, a 5 1/2 day recess, usually work only 4 days on a good week, then send jurors into a media saturated world? Prolonging the opportunity for problems would be an understatement. An unsequestered jury should be working 8-10hrs. a day(including breaks), 5 days a week, no extra "days off", they should focus solely on the trial. All this extra time is asking for trouble.
That was very interesting, Jackie!
I agree with the analyst--that when Scott said his affair was "inappropriate", he was probably borrowing that namby-pamby term from Clinton, who used it years earlier.
Why is it so hard for people to make the connection? CHEATING ON YOUR WIFE/HUSBAND IS DISHONEST. IF YOU ARE DISHONEST, THEN HOW CAN WE TRUST ANYTHING YOU SAY?
Scott gave several interviews where he proclaimed his innocence. But we know he did something really dishonest, not long before he gave those interviews: we know he cheated on Laci, and lied to Amber, and lied to Shawn. So why are we then supposed to just take every word he utters as the Gospel truth?