I was convinced as things were revealed that he made two trips...but proving it doesn't seem possible...There is more than one Gamefisher boat in that area and the jury could discount that testimony with a good cross examination.
That's why I am hoping there is more than we know, when it comes to accounting for how Scott really spent the night of Dec. 23.
I honestly expect to be surprised in some way.
One key thing is going to be, I think, WHEN is the very, very first time it was publicized, even locally there, that Scott said he'd been fishing in the Bay that day? And how specific was the info given to the public about exactly which way he went, when he launched his boat at Berkeley that day?
For months upon months, I sat reading these threads, and saw over and over, people would complain that they weren't telling us, the public, enough. I probably said it myself a couple times. But inwardly I knew that while we need to be informed, the authorities have every right to keep mum when there is a murder investigation at stake.
Now we see how telling the public too much is not always in the public's interest. The fact that we heard what Scott's alibi was gives his lying lawyer a chance to claim that everyone knew exactly where Scott was fishing, and that therefore this mysterious, motiveless murderer dumped the body right there, in order to "frame" Scott. And that's just how his lying lawyer might deny the public the justice of seeing the perpetrator punished for this awful crime.