Exactly what I tried to tell that poster. We have been talking about this for months & months, we get tired for repeating & repeating. And did you notice the new posters come up with facts that are sooooo old news then want us to rehash them too. Like Amber is involved, well I think the LE cleared her or she'd be in a cell too!
You said it, Blondee!
I know for a fact that I viewed Scott as an all-right guy at first, b/c I was impressed that his IN-LAWS, of all people, had such warm, kind things to say about him.
I remember people on here were NOT condemning Scott at first. It was just a mystery, and some of us love a mystery.
And Amber. When she first came to light, I remember posting that I had seen a Forensic Files show on which a guy's ex-girlfriend came to his home while he was away. The guy had since married, and he and his wife had a young infant. The ex-girlfriend--with whom the guy had NOT been carrying on an affair--killed the wife and baby, apparently just out of spite.
So I suggested to the posters that maybe Amber did this, as a sort of "Fatal Attraction" kind of thing. A few others suggested it, too. Others refused to believe it, and it turns out they were right. Amber was not involved in this. I firmly believe she'd have been charged, if she had been.
I mean, if they could've brought charges against her, what better way to force her into testifying against anything Scott might have done in concert with her?
I would love to ask the defense why the police would insist on "getting" this obscure manure salesman. What's so special about him? If they'd found evidence leading to Amber, I believe they would have been just as happy to "get" her.