Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H
They said Congress was within its powers to rule that MJ had no medicinal value.

Is it the mark of a free country when a court determines that a legislative body should make medical decisions? What do we have doctors for, licensed by the state, no less?

17 posted on 06/30/2004 8:36:06 PM PDT by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: coloradan
What do we have doctors for, licensed by the state, no less?

Licensed by the state to obey state laws. Duh...

20 posted on 06/30/2004 8:57:00 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: coloradan
Is it the mark of a free country when a court determines that a legislative body should make medical decisions?

I think Congress has absolutely no power under Article I to decide medical matters. However, USSC and Congress subscribe to the "substantial effects" Commerce Clause sophistry and do not agree with me at this time.

Justice Thomas seems to share my views on the matter.

What do we have doctors for, licensed by the state, no less?

Agreed. State government is the proper place for regulation of medicine.

24 posted on 06/30/2004 10:12:50 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson