No, 1 rudeboy, I don't have to make that argument. The fence issue centers on the principle that both property owners enjoy a benefit from the fence, therefore both should pay a proportionate share of the costs. Furthermore, a single entity - in this case, the lawyer - can act and create a liability for his neighbors without their consent.
All Americans enjoy the benefits of well-paying jobs for Americans and strong manufacturing infrastructure. Therefore, it is right and proper that we should pay to accomplish that worthwhile end. We should do this even though the free traitors withhold consent.
Again, as in the case of the fence, elect a candidate that supports your view. Did you forget that you were talking of the law?
"All Americans enjoy the benefits of well-paying jobs for Americans and strong manufacturing infrastructure. Therefore, it is right and proper that we should pay to accomplish that worthwhile end."
...and you WILL comply with what WE feel is a worthwhile end... we will tax you to pay for your neighbors kids to go to college, and prevent you from making your own life better in the way YOU feel it should be better by limiting the amount and selection of goods you may purchase with the money we leave you. WE say it is right and proper to do this, and WE are your government.