Skip to comments.
Hillary Clinton: "We're Going to Take Things Away From You on Behalf of the Common Good"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1162094/posts ^
| Tuesday, June 29, 2004
| Kristinn
Posted on 06/29/2004 6:12:49 AM PDT by kristinn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 301-316 next last
To: William Terrell
What would be more egregious than an income tax? Granted, I'm in the middle of an audit, so I'm kinda sensitive right now.
81
posted on
06/29/2004 7:19:05 AM PDT
by
JTHomes
To: freeperfromnj
Only a democrat could have proposed a "millionares tax" and include those who make less than 1 million.
Truth be known (and this is a guess on my part) there are probably more people in the 500K - 1 mil range than above 1 mil ...
82
posted on
06/29/2004 7:19:25 AM PDT
by
dartuser
To: axel f
I saw this. It's enough to gag a maggot. The only thing to be happy for is that she can't hide any more. The entire nation know what a witch she is.
To: freeperfromnj
I celebrate the day I moved out of NJ. My house there was 6x bigger than the house I have here in PA, but the taxes were 20x higher. I pay less than $500 here; ten years ago I was paying $10K over there.
While we're at it, the crime rate was way, way more than 20x higher than here. No comparison.
Can't sprint over to Manhattan any hour I feel like it. Can't smell the ocean. *sigh* Oh, well...
To: gathersnomoss
Hillary's expanding balls must be putting a strain on Old CrustyLol, that is too funny.
85
posted on
06/29/2004 7:24:28 AM PDT
by
badbass
To: YaYa123
....."her husband headlining a fund-raiser Monday evening for the American Himalayan Foundation".......
Huh? The American Himalayan Foundation??? Willie, have you sucked so much speech money out of the world that you're relegated to these third rate venues??
What's next? The Chappaqua school crossing guard bake sale??
86
posted on
06/29/2004 7:26:19 AM PDT
by
aShepard
To: kristinn
OOPS! I think she just messed up big time. We tend to vote with our "pocketbooks" Who was the candidate that said he was going to be honest, and that he would raise taxes if elected? They have to lie to us, to win :')
To: kristinn
Folks, this story and the link to the San Francisco newspaper article needs to saved by everyone and passed on via email, regular mail, phone callls, conversation, carrier pigeon, and whatever else it takes to alert our nation. The Democrats have admitted in public in an election year, that they plan on praqcticing Marxist socialism taking money away from those who earn money and give it to others.
If elected, the Democrats will raise taxes. Pass it on.
To: kristinn
Yeah kristinn, but tell em' to quit talking and DO something about it! They have the majorities in both houses and I can't see much improvement. But I'll vote for them anyway because I would rather vote Republican than Satan himself.......in the guise of the Demonrats.
89
posted on
06/29/2004 7:41:59 AM PDT
by
Dawgreg
(Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
To: dartuser
Only a democrat could have proposed a "millionares tax" and include those who make less than 1 million. It kicked in at $250,000. Algore explained it this way.
"If you make $250,000 four years in a row, your a millionaire." --Algore
90
posted on
06/29/2004 7:43:02 AM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: aShepard
The Himalayan Foundation caught my attention too. It's funny isn't it, how Clinton roams the earth looking for do-goodie projects. Da man wants his Nobel Peace Prize, by golly!!
When I looked THF up, guess what? It's connected to Sir Edmund Hillary's organization. Just like Clinton isn't it, to brazen out what would embarrass other people.
91
posted on
06/29/2004 7:46:03 AM PDT
by
YaYa123
(@"Corruption"...thy name is Clinton.com)
To: blackdog
Maybe so but the rich still get soaked. Just look at the stats on how much of the total tax bill the top 1% pay. The problem is not who's getting soaked - we're all getting soaked. The level of taxation is the problem not the distribution. The dems won't touch that. They will just rabble rouse and stir up emotions. We need an unemotional flat tax.
To: kristinn
Liberalism in Democrat politics always pursues big government quasi-socialist ideals. No surprise here.
93
posted on
06/29/2004 7:47:51 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
(is a conservative.)
To: stillnoprotestsagainstmuslims
94
posted on
06/29/2004 7:48:44 AM PDT
by
B4Ranch
(We're going to take things away from you (guns) on behalf of the common good." Hillary 6/29/2004)
To: kristinn
95
posted on
06/29/2004 7:48:46 AM PDT
by
backinthefold
(9/11 changed me, and I will never forget)
To: kristinn
DemocRAT-ic communist Party of America...friends don't let friends vote for communists.
96
posted on
06/29/2004 7:49:06 AM PDT
by
ApesForEvolution
("American islamocommunists" are not Americans. They live in some 'other America' & must b destroyed)
To: YaYa123
....It's connected to Sir Edmund Hillary's organization.....
Oh, then that explains it. Mrs Rodham probably asked Willard to speak to her daughter's namesake organization!
97
posted on
06/29/2004 7:49:34 AM PDT
by
aShepard
To: CindyDawg
LOL at the story of your life. Really funny!
98
posted on
06/29/2004 7:50:37 AM PDT
by
YaYa123
(@"Corruption"...thy name is Clinton.com)
To: YaYa123
To: JTHomes
The NRST.
100
posted on
06/29/2004 7:52:41 AM PDT
by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 301-316 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson