[RGSpincich]

No blood on the gun, but strands of hair/fiber and debris. Doesn't seem like the gun was recently cleaned to remove any blood evidence that would be present if it was used as a blunt object. They introduce the gun and move off quickly into coworkers testimony, the forensic people may revisit the gun when it's their turn.

OTH, The only expert thus far was an firearms ID expert not a forensic guy. this witness not finding blood evidence may be irrelevant.

[Devil_Anse]

Well, I hope we can trust the state to at least bring in all this evidence about the gun ONLY if it means something. They shouldn't bore the jury, otherwise.

So I'm still in hope that the gun will mean SOMETHING.