Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2004 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 6/28/2004
TradeSports.com ^ | Monday, June 28, 2004 | Momaw Nadon

Posted on 06/28/2004 2:03:37 PM PDT by Momaw Nadon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Integrityrocks
Last week he had more points.. which points did he lose?

New Mexico, 5 Electoral Votes.

41 posted on 06/28/2004 2:35:09 PM PDT by Momaw Nadon (Goals for 2004: Re-elect President Bush, over 60 Republicans in the Senate, and a Republican House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

Maine splits EV's


42 posted on 06/28/2004 2:39:13 PM PDT by larryjohnson (FReepersonaltrainer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

Opinions of TradeSports.Com:

61.0 for a Bush Florida is a good deal.
59.0 for a Bush Ohio is a good deal.

46.0 for Kerry in New Hampshire is an excellent deal, I think he'll carry NH.


Michigan (36) and Minnesota (32) are outrageous bargains for Bush. They are two that I would jump on right now if I was into this sort of thing.

If the cards start falling Bush's way with Iraq and the economy, which it looks like is going to happen.. Bush is going to win by 6-7 points in November, and those two states above will be a big payday come November.


For an instant pop, if you think Kerry is going to pick Edwards for VP.. I can see North Carolina dropping down to 55-60 for Bush.. Most of the polls I've seen with an Edwards ticket puts a BUsh lead at 1-2.


Just a few ideas if anyone is interested in making a buck off this.


43 posted on 06/28/2004 2:51:50 PM PDT by Josh in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GLH3IL
it will give him the voter mandate he needs to be much more aggressive in pursuing a conservative agenda.

Thank you for pointing this out. People take potshots at Bush, and yet when one considers the nearly impossible obstacles he's faced from Day One through this entire 3-1/2 years, he's done a remarkable job. Give him an electoral mandate, plus an increased Republican Senate and House, he can start kicking the Dems to the side of the road.

44 posted on 06/28/2004 2:52:24 PM PDT by My2Cents ("Well.....there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Professor Burke
I have difficulty believing President Bush has any chance of winning New Mexico. Before becoming a resident of the Great State of Texas I was a native born New Mexican the state is literally crawling with libs. They occasionally vote republican to preserve the special relationship between the state and the feds, but nonetheless there is probably a 90% chance MR. Kerry will win the state as things currently stand.

What are you a professor of? Asinine mindless posts?

45 posted on 06/28/2004 2:56:44 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (Strategery - "W" plays poker with one hand and chess with the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

Trump your taag line


46 posted on 06/28/2004 3:07:27 PM PDT by spokeshave (strategery + schadenfreude = stratenschadenfreudery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

Right now as it stands, they have the 2000 map duplicating itself in entirety. A possible outcome but IMO not likely. Things change, the maps always vary every election.


47 posted on 06/28/2004 3:08:28 PM PDT by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Citizen of the Savage Nation

Also, the Reagan bounce, which most polls caught, has not made itself apparent on TradeSports...Bush continued to slide albeit at a small pace over the last month.


48 posted on 06/28/2004 3:12:09 PM PDT by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

I'm from Michigan and, as far as I can tell, if they could just stop the voter fraud in Detroit, the state would go to Bush. Unfortunately, the unions and high minority population in Detroit make for a slim chance of an honest election in that part of the state.


49 posted on 06/28/2004 3:26:16 PM PDT by onevoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

I realize these guys are more bookies than prognosticators, but Oklahoma and Nebraska a point higher than Texas in probability? I don't see it, all W's got to do is come home and get some rest in Crawford once in a while, Texas is in the pocket. Virginia sounds a little high, but Bush will carry there.

Right now, I see Pennsylvania and Ohio as the win/lose states. We really, really need Pennsylvania.


50 posted on 06/28/2004 3:47:21 PM PDT by barkeep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

A couple of interesting things. According to the rules, NM goes to Kerry even though AFIAK there have been no actual trades on the Kerry side (it's been on Bush's side for 3 months, and gone from there to 50/50). I've got no idea why it started for Bush nor why it's been moving to Kerry.

Another interesting thing is that the movement has been towards Kerry on this site, while other indicators, including the other trading site (the Iowa exchange) have been showing movements in Bush's direction.

Finally, as has been pointed out, after much maneuvering of states, we're exactly back to 2000.


51 posted on 06/28/2004 3:53:10 PM PDT by TomEwall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson