Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RW1974

TR was more in the neocon paradigm than was McKinley, who I personally think RWR emulated to a great degree. But unlike McKinley RWR had and extremely hostile Congress and media, so he had to back off during his second term. Bush Sr. was a borderline neocon-liberal, Clinton was a liberal-Communist-Marxist - and W? The jury is very much still out. His 2nd term should be telling....


95 posted on 06/28/2004 12:07:31 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Right makes right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: GOP_1900AD

I'm just not sure I like the use of the term "neocon". It seems like a sloppy buzzword to me, that's applied with too little thought by the media.

"Neo" means something new, or a revival of something in a different way. The original use of neocon was as a description for those Dems and liberals who switched to conservatism - hence "new conservatives". Why it should now be used as a buzzword for conservatives who favor interventionism is somewhat puzzling.


98 posted on 06/28/2004 12:13:29 PM PDT by RW1974
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson