Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eskimo
Most rational people would likely be of the opposite opinion.

LOL! If "rational" is defined by Pat Buchanan and WND, count me out.

14 posted on 06/28/2004 11:10:18 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb
LOL! If "rational" is defined by Pat Buchanan and WND, count me out.

LOL! I already did.

15 posted on 06/28/2004 11:14:32 AM PDT by eskimo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: r9etb
LOL! If "rational" is defined by Pat Buchanan and WND, count me out.

Ad hominem statements about the author or publisher of a piece do not disprove the truth of its content. The reference to WND is particularly irrelevant since they merely published the piece. State one thing in Pat's article that you disagree with and explain why. Regardless of your personal opinion of him, Pat is right on the money with this editorial.

21 posted on 06/28/2004 11:30:37 AM PDT by Texas Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson