Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: juzcuz


Yes, early on after Amber first became known, we heard that she had recorded her conversations with Scott BEFORE all the Laci stuff happened--but AFTER the incident where Amber herself confronted Scott to tell him she'd found out he was married.

And Juzcuz, in early 2003, there was an NE story about a previous alleged affair of Amber's. In that one, Amber had dated the husband of a pregnant woman named Michelle. During that whole thing, Amber had allegedly met with Michelle (a confrontation where the two argued over Michelle's husband), and Amber taped this conversation she had with Michelle.

So apparently Amber is of the mindset that tape recordings can be good things to have. The obvious possibility that comes to mind is bribery, or something like that.

But we don't KNOW if that's really why Amber taped those mid-December calls. Considering that she also engaged a detective to find out more about her boyfriend Scott, it just begins to look like Amber is kind of conniving. BUT that's probably a good thing--if she had been a totally naive little innocent, SHE might've ended up at the bottom of the Bay, too!

At this point, I feel kind of glad that Amber wasn't just some born-yesterday airhead type!


74 posted on 06/28/2004 1:31:23 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Devil_Anse

Hi, DA, ...I recall all the "recorded calls before getting the news Scott was married or Laci missing" stories,..I know there was word she talked to a PI,etc....I don't know if this is relevent but I'm sure Geragos will muddy the waters with it...

Broncchini(ignores and hides a critical eyewitness, framing Scott,MUD), Kim M.(burglar, bipolar ,implicates is involved in Laci disappearance..MUD), Amber(is a lying husband stealing Linda Tripp...could be a suspect,MUD)


77 posted on 06/28/2004 1:46:20 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: Jackie-O; Canadian Outrage; RGSpincich; MEG33; Howlin; All

I can't believe I missed the one little update that Court TV had on this case! It was Kimberley Guilfoyle-Newsom's show. Why is it that the minute there is something about this case, suddenly the phone is ringing and the kids just HAVE to talk to me at that moment?? I could see the words on the TV screen, and heard a few words, but, darn it, all the hubbub around here drowned it out!

It was something about Kim McGregor. Someone (was it you MEG?) made a mention of it earlier on the thread here. But I'd love to hear more of what, if anything, came out in testimony about Kim McGregor!

Anyone got more details? I am still mad that I had to miss it!


79 posted on 06/28/2004 1:58:32 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: Devil_Anse

but AFTER the incident where Amber herself confronted Scott to tell him she'd found out he was married.
----
I can see that.. He also told her, when he first met her, that he had never had a relationship/love or something to that effect. I would have been suspicious then.. What 30 year old 'attractive' man has never experienced "any" type of loving relationship?


122 posted on 06/28/2004 3:43:46 PM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson