If its effective, I'm all for it.
1 posted on
06/27/2004 1:51:35 PM PDT by
wagglebee
To: wagglebee
Yep, let's put Michael Moore to some good use.
2 posted on
06/27/2004 1:52:27 PM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
To: wagglebee
Hey hey hey.
6 posted on
06/27/2004 2:00:25 PM PDT by
Toddsterpatriot
(Cry......and let slip the dogs of whine.)
To: wagglebee
Interest Grows in Blimps for Homeland Security LOL.......not 'more' UFO's.........LOL
(hang-up the phone Art Bell)
:-)
7 posted on
06/27/2004 2:01:58 PM PDT by
maestro
To: wagglebee
"Think of us as a low-hanging satellite..."
 |
|
Don't laugh. It might work. |
8 posted on
06/27/2004 2:06:14 PM PDT by
Fintan
(My weiners don't burn. They sizzle.)
To: wagglebee
I've been having weird flashes of images all day here, this headline made me think of Dr. Atkins.
13 posted on
06/27/2004 2:23:21 PM PDT by
Old Professer
(Interests in common are commonly abused.)
To: wagglebee
This article is about High Altitude Airships (HAA) that are unmanned and used for surveillance
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/aviation/article/0,12543,583484,00.html
but I prefer
Battle Blimps
which could be manned and unmanned, and could be equipped with either mirrors for re-directing laser weapons over the horizon from their source (such as a ground or ship based weapon) or could even carry the lasers themselves.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/military/2002/3/return_of_battle_blimps/
14 posted on
06/27/2004 2:28:44 PM PDT by
Phsstpok
(often wrong, but never in doubt)
To: wagglebee
I'm sure it will be as effective as all other government programs. In fact, soon it can be expanded to include tax cheats and dead beat dads.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson