To: xzins
But what nobody except Michael Moore and the rest of the conspirazoids would dispute is that there is a significant accumulation of circumstantial links between al-Qaida and Iraq -- including meetings between Osama bin Laden himself and Iraqi officials, the presence of al-Qaida operatives at Iraqi embassy functions, the presence of al-Qaida associates within Iraq, etc.... A couple of days later, on June 21, commission member John Lehman went on "Meet the Press" and mentioned a lieutenant-colonel in Saddam's Fedayeen who had significant ties to al-Qaida, including sitting in on a three-day meeting in Malaysia in January 2001 with several of the 9/11 hijackers. This, said Lehman, is "new intelligence, and this has come since our staff report has been written." Really? I mentioned the lieutenant-colonel in question in a column in the Australian a month ago. I first heard of it months before that. And I'm just a third-rate pundit, not a big commission with gazillions of dollars and unlimited access. The reality is this: There are connections between Saddam and al-Qaida. A mere 14 months after the liberation of Iraq, we don't yet know enough to reach a definitive conclusion about those connections. The jury is still out, and so should the commission's camera-hoggers have been.Interesting article for your "Salman Pak, etc." Archives, xzins; Steyn Ping.
50 posted on
06/28/2004 9:17:47 PM PDT by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Thanks OP.
The jury is still out, and so should the commission's camera-hoggers have been.
911 Commission is out to lunch and a tremendous waste of time and money.
This will get added to my list.
51 posted on
06/29/2004 11:07:26 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army and Supporting Bush/Cheney 2004!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson