Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: maestro
Actually, the Patton/Montgomery feud is myth. They weren't friends, but they were not the bitter rivals portrayed in the film. They actually had as much respect for one another as 2 men with egos that large could.

The producers of the film needed a foil for Patton, and Montgomery was an obvious choice.
34 posted on 06/25/2004 9:15:06 PM PDT by sharktrager (George Clooney has rubber nipples.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: sharktrager

I've read Monty's autobiography.

He certainly had a large enough ego....I'm not sure 2 egos that big could fit inside one tent, one briefing room, ...


36 posted on 06/25/2004 9:17:58 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army and Supporting Bush/Cheney 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: sharktrager
Actually, the Patton/Montgomery feud is myth. They weren't friends, but they were not the bitter rivals portrayed in the film. They actually had as much respect for one another as 2 men with egos that large could.

True. Monty's real feud was with Eisenhower. And that was actually quite civil.

Funny thing, though. Contrary to the film, General Bradley seems to have earnestly disliked Patton - though Patton seemed to have been as fond of Bradley as the film depicts. General Bradley was the chief military advisor to the movie, so one assumes he later relented, or at least thought it wise not to air his dislike in such a public way. But Patton biographer Calos D'Este discovered some pretty solid evidence that Bradley was no fan of Patton's during the war.

58 posted on 06/25/2004 9:47:23 PM PDT by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson