Posted on 06/25/2004 12:17:15 PM PDT by gilliam
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- In an interview with Irish television ahead of a U.S.-EU summit, U.S. President George W. Bush defended his stance on Iraq and said the war has not incited terrorists.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Hmm, Clinton's eight years of doing nothing about terror = the worst terror attack on America ever.
Bush's almost three years of taking the war to the terrorist = no major terror attacks on the US.
The math is rather obvious here...
I hope the Iraqi war IS inciting terrorists, the more that come out the more we can kill. The more we kill the safer we are.
I saw part of this interview on CNN though they cut it off as soon as Bush stopped the interviewer from interrupting and was about to blow her (interviewer) out of the water noting it was peaceful on the morning of 9/11 too ;)
You're right. As they're "incited", they become self-identified and a whole lot easier to kill that way. Personally, I'd love it if the whole stinking lot of them flew to Iraq and proceeded to become bomb fodder for our military forces. I'm sure they'd love the practice.
Is the situation in Iraq better or worse than it's portrayed in the media?
Better 40% 58122 votes
Worse 60% 87328 votes
Total: 145450 votes
Hmmm, personally I liked the idea of Iraq being a big terrorist bug zapper in the middle of the Mideast.
I do too, but that also goes counter to our larger goals there - a stable, democratic Iraq. Eventually it will happen and the terrorists will have to go to the weaker spots - Saudi , Pakistan, etc... which they are doing.
Nah.. the WOT hasn't incited the insurgents. But danged, they hear the "F" word, and they get all stirred up, no? lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.