Posted on 06/25/2004 8:50:33 AM PDT by sdk7x7
Sent this to Drudge, let's see if he posts...
Clinton....a lifetime of "inappropriate encounters."
Clinton picked the wrong guy to lie about. Roger Porter is as square and clean a guy as there is. He is a "policy wonk," not a political guy at all. I took a class from him at the Kennedy School in 1980, and knew him in the Reagan administration as well. There is no way he would ever have had a political conversation with Bill Clinton, much less use the kind of language Clinton says he did. Porter knows a lot of very influential people in both parties and is uniformly highly regarded. It was incredibly stupid of Clinton to put this fairy tale in his book, no matter how many times he may have told the story to his friends. Porter is being a lot more classy about this than most people would be.
Kerry in Nam?
No F'ing way
Roger Porter
"Incredibly stupid" and "fairy tale" seem to be terms I routinely associate with x42.
Because he's a pathological liar.
This is NOT the first person to say that Clontoon lied in his book....why don't they all get together and sue with a class action!
How stupid can these people be!!! To STILL be amazed at billyblythe's lying is amazing to me. Stupid is as stupid does.
Clinton is a psycopath who keeps referring to himself as 2 different people
Main Entry: psychopathic personality
Function: noun
1 : an emotionally and behaviorally disordered state characterized by clear perception of reality except for the individual's social and moral obligations and often by the pursuit of immediate personal gratification in criminal acts, drug addiction, or sexual perversion
2 : an individual having a psychopathic personality
I cannot imagine there NOT being slander suits over this book.
Tony Snow did a send up of Clinton and his parallel lives statement from the Oprah interview. Tony preoved that Clinton is Certifiably Scizophrenic as can be gleaned from his own words.
When we experience a Clinton lie, Clinton sees and experiences a "parallel life". Clinton's statements have different meanings according to which parallel li(f)e he is living at the moment. To wit - his asking "what the meaning of is, is?"
Schizophrenia is so common that it's amazing no one has profiled Clinton this way before. He is a walking talking poster boy for sociopathic schizophrenic denial of reality. Which is another "duh!" moment.
I'm sure there are plenty of Psych profs at Harvard that could give Porter chapter and verse on the abnormal psychology of the pathological liar. The summary from Osric University is "A deliberate liar knows he is lying. A pathological liar may not." Is that a possible answer to Porter's question? And while he is asking about that prez, maybe he can get a line on his veep too.
Kerry? A Viet vet? No kidding. I never knew. Gosh, he should tell somebody about it. LOL.
Disturbed liberals arrogant sense of entitlement is destructive; they recognize no greater good higher than themselves.
Now this explains why they are paranoid about public manifestations of religion. After all, religion sets parameters for human behavior. Libs and religion----like holding a cross before a vampire-----they just go all to pieces (smirk).
Libs get their jollies dictating to the rest of us how to live, and what we can or cannot think or believe. ADL Abe and the Thought Police railed against the movie, The Passion, hoping to make it fail. These religion-haters were paranoid that people would actually be exposed to religious thoughts.
Yet, here's what passes for deluded liberal "thinking" nowadays. Libs blithely say that 24/7 non-stop sexually explicit music and TV shows, MTV's raunch, violent blood and guts-filled videos and movies have no effect on audiences, especially kids, that its "make-believe."
However, a 15-second commercial is expected to compel hundreds of millions of Americans to buy billions of dollars of soup, soap, deodorant and depilatory.
Typical of disturbed, deluded liberals. They want to have it both ways........a good definition of schizophrenia.
Clinton told a lie? Wa Wa What!?
The book, which weighs in at more than 950 pages, is sloppy, self-indulgent and often eye-crossingly dull the sound of one man prattling away, not for the reader, but for himself and some distant recording angel of history.
In many ways, the book is a mirror of Mr. Clinton's presidency: lack of discipline leading to squandered opportunities; high expectations, undermined by self-indulgence and scattered concentration. But the very lack of focus and order that mars these pages also prevented him from summoning his energies in a sustained manner to bring his insights about the growing terror threat and an Israeli-Palestinian settlement to fruition.
"My Life" has little of classic's unsparing candor or historical perspective. Instead, it devolves into a hodgepodge of jottings: part policy primer, part 12-step confessional, part stump speech and part presidential archive, all, it seems, hurriedly written and even more hurriedly edited.
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.