Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA chief announces plan to transform agency
CNN.com ^ | Thursday, June 24, 2004 | Michael Coren

Posted on 06/25/2004 4:24:54 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon

CNN) -- NASA's vision to explore the moon and Mars moved forward Thursday with a restructuring effort to streamline the agency's bureaucracy and support an independent private space industry.

Sean O'Keefe, NASA's chief, announced the plan to remake NASA into a "sustainable and affordable" organization that was once-again renowned for its innovation, courage and entrepreneurial spirit.

"Transforming the way we do business [requires] very specific efforts," he said. "We have to develop an agility...to respond more rapidly to changing events."

One of the most immediate changes -- which goes into effect August 1 -- will divide NASA's strategic offices into "Mission Directorates" in four areas: aeronautic research, science, exploration systems and space operations.

It also established two new positions -- a chief safety and education officer -- to address those priorities, especially in the aftermath of space shuttle Columbia's destruction. The chief safety and mission assurance officer will report directly to the NASA administrator.

An independent commercial space sector -- which has failed to materialize under NASA patronage -- is also expected to play a major role in future space operations.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nasa; seanokeefe
FYI and discussion
1 posted on 06/25/2004 4:24:54 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Sounds like there was an emergency meeting at NASA immediately upon the successful completion of the private SpaceShipOne mission. "Guys", says O'Keefe slamming his hands on the conference room table, "We need to do something quick before we're obsolete and irrelevant."

Amazing how for so long this agency has insisted that space travel is way too expensive and complicated for private ventures to handle, and should only be left to the government. Now, all of a sudden, it's singing a different tune. They want to work with private industry to make a better NASA.

Sorry, NASA, private enterprise will take it from here.

2 posted on 06/25/2004 4:34:41 AM PDT by tdadams (If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

The word "sustainable" says to me that its over for NASA. Don't forget that the insulation that damaged the fatal shuttle flight was changed to be more environmentally acceptable to the fish in the sea when the tank hit the ocean.


3 posted on 06/25/2004 5:11:43 AM PDT by Thebaddog (Woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
NASA chief announces plan to transform agency...

INTO A GIANT FIGHTING ROBOT!


4 posted on 06/25/2004 5:27:01 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
For all the nice words about streamlining and reducing bureaucracy, the only concrete changes I could find in the article all added bureaucrats. There was a 'Safety' officer, and and 'Education' officer, and (apparently) another layer of management over groups of field offices.

My conclusion: Bureaucrats 'just don't get it' when the need is to reduce bureaucracy. Something about pigs flying comes to mind.
5 posted on 06/25/2004 5:27:59 AM PDT by Gorjus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
"We need to do something quick before we're obsolete and irrelevant."

Or

"We need to do something quick before everybody realizes that we've been obsolete and irrelevant since the end of Apollo"

6 posted on 06/25/2004 6:02:24 AM PDT by Thermalseeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

NASA's rotating the tires.


7 posted on 06/25/2004 7:30:42 AM PDT by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
Sounds like there was an emergency meeting at NASA immediately upon the successful completion of the private SpaceShipOne mission. "Guys", says O'Keefe slamming his hands on the conference room table, "We need to do something quick before we're obsolete and irrelevant."

Sorry, you simply have no idea. These changes were pushed from the top. They are being done to accommodate the amibitious programs that NASA will be undertaking in the near future, not the least of which is the manned return to the moon and an eventual manned Mars mission.

Amazing how for so long this agency has insisted that space travel is way too expensive and complicated for private ventures to handle, and should only be left to the government. Now, all of a sudden, it's singing a different tune. They want to work with private industry to make a better NASA.

NASA has always worked closely with the private industry in all aspects of its programs. Where the hell have you been hiding?

Sorry, NASA, private enterprise will take it from here.

That's sorely ridiculous. The best private enterprise has been able to do is reach a suborbital altitude. That's a far cry from doing what NASA does. And until it does what NASA does, you're whistling in the dark, chum.

8 posted on 06/25/2004 8:54:28 AM PDT by Prime Choice (When Clinton lies, he insults our integrity. When Kerry lies, he insults our intelligence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

Let me guess, you work for NASA. And you're wrong, I do have some familiarity with the workings at NASA.


9 posted on 06/25/2004 9:04:34 AM PDT by tdadams (If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
you're wrong, I do have some familiarity with the workings at NASA.

Some, but obviously not nearly enough. If you had more than a passing familiarity with what NASA does, you wouldn't have made even half of the ridiculous claims you did in your previous message. That's a fact, jack.

10 posted on 06/25/2004 9:10:04 AM PDT by Prime Choice (When Clinton lies, he insults our integrity. When Kerry lies, he insults our intelligence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
I wonder why NASA doesn't do planning of various things, serious planning, PR and color graphisc of, say, asteroid mining, aluminum smelters in space, agriculture in space.

It wouldn't hurt them to divert some resources to this: a few graphic artists, an engineer for a few days. Are they allowed to think only up to the level of Congress?

11 posted on 06/25/2004 9:15:42 AM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Reorganizations seem to be the thing bureaucrats do because they don't know how to build things or make the dirt fly. What they need more than reorganization is a clear mission and the support of the people and institutions that can make it happen, and a competent cadre of engineers who can bend the tin and make the dust fly, and will be left alone for the time they need to do those things.

I am one of several subcontractors working on the JIMO program and I can tell you that all the branch chief in charge of the specific part of the program I am working on asks us about are, first, budget exercises, and, second, program metrics. Nothing about the technical progress, the discoveries we're making in semiconductor radiation hardness and materials science, nothing about the basic science. But he's the one who should be interested in that and asking those questions, since he's a Ph.D. in physics himself. But he's hung up in the bureaucracy, spending most of his time in meetings and bean counting.

12 posted on 06/25/2004 9:33:09 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

I guess I nailed you on working for NASA, eh? A little sore aren't you?


13 posted on 06/25/2004 9:45:29 AM PDT by tdadams (If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
I guess I nailed you on working for NASA, eh? A little sore aren't you?

It's a straw man argument, kid. Look, just admit that you're whistling in the dark (which you are) and let it go.

14 posted on 06/25/2004 9:47:08 AM PDT by Prime Choice (When Clinton lies, he insults our integrity. When Kerry lies, he insults our intelligence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
Then tell me you don't work for NASA and end the squabble once and for all. If you won't do that, case closed. You lose, greybeard.
15 posted on 06/25/2004 9:55:11 AM PDT by tdadams (If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
You lose, greybeard.

You called?

16 posted on 06/25/2004 9:57:00 AM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
Then tell me you don't work for NASA and end the squabble once and for all. If you won't do that, case closed. You lose, greybeard.

What does my working or not working for NASA have to do with your blatantly ignorant statements regarding NASA? Sheesh...are you wanting to argue this matter intelligently or just be belligerent?

17 posted on 06/25/2004 1:37:46 PM PDT by Prime Choice (When Clinton lies, he insults our integrity. When Kerry lies, he insults our intelligence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
Sounds like there was an emergency meeting at NASA immediately upon the successful completion of the private SpaceShipOne mission. "Guys", says O'Keefe slamming his hands on the conference room table, "We need to do something quick before we're obsolete and irrelevant."

If you'd been paying attention several months ago, you'd recall that Bush's announcement of the new space initiative included a significant restructuring of NASA, some results of which Mr. O'Keefe has announced today.

18 posted on 06/25/2004 1:40:59 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

I figured as much. Thanks for confirming.


19 posted on 06/25/2004 4:06:48 PM PDT by tdadams (If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson