Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Airports Can Go Back to Private Screeners (with stupid Democrat quote)
Associated Press ^ | 25 June 2004 | Leslie Miller

Posted on 06/24/2004 11:42:39 AM PDT by July 4th

WASHINGTON - Airports that want to replace government security screeners with privately employed workers can do so by early next summer, the Bush administration told Congress on Thursday.

Thomas Blank, assistant administrator at the Transportation Security Administration, told the Senate aviation subcommittee that airports will have three options: remain in the federal system, use a private contractor to hire and train screeners, or run the screening themselves. They can apply for a change in November.

Airport groups estimate between 20 and 100 of the 445 commercial airports under TSA supervision will choose to opt out of the current system. Those that do will be able to leave the federal system starting early next summer, Black said, though their security systems still will be overseen by the TSA.

Smaller airports are likely to be most interested in running their own screening operations because it would be simpler. They would avoid red tape from Washington while they could do their own hiring and training.

Blank said the TSA is considering allowing airports that hire their own screeners to use them for tasks unrelated to security during off-peak hours. That would solve a problem for airports that have busy morning and evening rush hours but not much for screeners to do in between.

Subcommittee Chairman Trent Lott, R-Miss., said the TSA had done a good job, but that he thinks private companies or small airports would be more efficient and could do the job more cheaply.

Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., disagreed, saying private companies will have to give screeners the same pay and benefits they receive as federal employees. "If they have to make a profit, it's going to cost more," Lautenberg said.

Some airport managers think private companies could do a better job than TSA, which they perceive as unresponsive to local needs. Others think security should remain a federal responsibility because private companies will likely put profit before the public interest.

Congress created the TSA after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and ordered the agency to replace the privately employed screeners with a better-paid, better-trained federal work force. More than 50,000 screeners were hired in less than a year, though that number has been trimmed to about 45,000.

Congress also ordered five commercial airports to use privately employed screeners who are hired, trained, paid and tested to TSA standards to serve as a comparison to the federal employees. Those airports are in San Francisco; Rochester, N.Y.; Tupelo, Miss.; Jackson, Wyo.; and Kansas City, Mo.

A study showed there was no difference between the performance or cost of federal and contract screeners, though the study's authors said the sample was too small to draw meaningful conclusions.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; airport; lautenberg; screeners; security; tsa
About the whole "economics" thing...the Democrats aren't even close to getting it, are they?
1 posted on 06/24/2004 11:42:41 AM PDT by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: July 4th

Wow! The actual end is in sight for a government make-work program. Amazing.


2 posted on 06/24/2004 11:45:55 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eno_

Wow Lautenberg is still alive?


3 posted on 06/24/2004 12:03:24 PM PDT by Unicorn (Two many wimps around The democrats would rather win the WH then win the war-Tom Delay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: July 4th

Interesting.


4 posted on 06/24/2004 12:06:25 PM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eno_

I'm not sure going back to the days of Argenbright is any better...


5 posted on 06/24/2004 12:07:01 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Couldn't be worse. Easier to fire private lunkheads. And we don't get stuck with the pension bill.


6 posted on 06/24/2004 12:26:11 PM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: July 4th

Bump for later.


7 posted on 06/24/2004 12:27:14 PM PDT by snopercod ("Stay quiet and you’ll be OK." -- Muhammad Atta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eno_

That's true.


8 posted on 06/24/2004 12:29:24 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: July 4th
So, what do all the other politicians who rammed this through as a "feel good" measure after 9/11, and then crowed about how they helped make America safer as a result, feel about this?

This is a slap in the face to all the politicians who ran on a platform of passing the TSA bill.

-PJ

9 posted on 06/24/2004 12:51:12 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Wow! The actual end is in sight for a government make-work program. Amazing.

Don't get your hopes up. Not too many of them want to go back to flipping burgers.

10 posted on 06/24/2004 1:24:53 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: July 4th

Remember: "You can't professionalize unless you federalize."

Thus spaketh the Dassle, whilst channeling the not-yet-dead Jesse Jackson, or maybe Tupac Shakur. I'm surprised Tom didn't add the word "beeyotch" at the end.


11 posted on 07/23/2004 9:36:44 PM PDT by The Libertarian Dude (Why, if we can just pass a few more laws, we can ALL be criminals! - J.R. "Bob" Dobbs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
So, what do all the other politicians who rammed this through as a "feel good" measure after 9/11, and then crowed about how they helped make America safer as a result, feel about this?

Many so-called "conservatives" thought it was a great idea also.

Personally, I'm thrilled that many of the jackboot-wannabees will be forced to find real work.

And for those that fret about their "security", grow up. You, and you alone (not the gov't) is responsible for your security.

Buy guns. Learn how to use them (and more importantly, use your mind). Stay alert. Avoid large crowds, or any places that will disarm you.

12 posted on 07/23/2004 9:39:44 PM PDT by Mulder (All might be free if they valued freedom, and defended it as they should.-- Samuel Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: July 4th

O'Reilly had some guy subbing for him today, can't recall his name, but he said that the gub'mint levies fines if more than two - TWO! - people of the same minority are given extra scrutiny.

No wonder we're not getting results. We have to search a whole lotta innocent white folks at them airports, lest we anger the PC Police.


13 posted on 07/23/2004 9:39:53 PM PDT by The Libertarian Dude (Why, if we can just pass a few more laws, we can ALL be criminals! - J.R. "Bob" Dobbs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
Don't get your hopes up. Not too many of them want to go back to flipping burgers.

Some of the more "eager" TSA stooges could be "promoted" to work security at Baghdad airport :)

14 posted on 07/23/2004 9:40:44 PM PDT by Mulder (All might be free if they valued freedom, and defended it as they should.-- Samuel Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson