Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are the terrorists for John Kerry?
The Kalamazoo Gazette ^ | 6-23-04 | Dick Morris

Posted on 06/24/2004 8:28:46 AM PDT by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Arrowhead1952
Shoot...you beat me to it, LOL! I was out looking for that pic under my previous posts. Copied the source into a file now...you won't beat me to the punch again : )
21 posted on 06/24/2004 9:14:01 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Are the terrorists for John Kerry?

Is the Pope Catholic?

Do Clintons lie?

Was Stalin a communist?

Was Hitler anti-semitic?

... etcetera ...

22 posted on 06/24/2004 9:14:43 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth; G.Mason; aliquis
As it turns out, I'm wrong. At least, I think so. The online references are making my head hurt.

I thought there had to be a preposition in there, but apparently not. The rule is, if you're talking about "him," it's "whom." If you're talking about "he" it's "who." So, the terrorists would vote for "him," not "he," so it's "whom." Ow!

I did find this small consolation:

When in doubt, use who. Why? Because whom only sounds natural when preceded by a preposition - e.g., Give the job to whomever you choose. That is why the literary stars, who work for effect rather than for grammatical points, often commit grammatical errors.
I couldn't be accurately described as a "literary star," but it's nice to share my shortcomings with them.

As for the dangling preposition, I ain't even going there.

23 posted on 06/24/2004 9:25:02 AM PDT by prion (Yes, as a matter of fact, I AM the spelling police)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter

I have several word documents with various names and pics. Easy to find them that way. Got one for F'ing, the c'toons, etc.


24 posted on 06/24/2004 9:26:04 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (It is not Bush's fault... it is the media's fault!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: prion
Should be either "who would the terrorists vote for?" or "for whom would the terrorists vote?"

The first uses a preposition to end a sentence with- not good. "For whom" is still the correct form but the form of the whole sentence is wrong which makes the "whom" awkward. These things need to be proofed by someone who is old enough to have been taught grammar in school.

25 posted on 06/24/2004 9:29:07 AM PDT by ThanhPhero (Ong la nguoi di hanh huong den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE

Thanks for the ping!


26 posted on 06/24/2004 9:30:11 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: prion
FWIT, I think I'm right. At least, I think so:)

When I designed this bumper sticker, I was not sure what was correct.

I queried my wife and my father-in-law, who lives with us. Three master's degrees and we couldn't agree either!

My wife suggested typing the phrase in MS Word and trying the grammar correction thingie. That didnt't resolve the question.

I then did a net search for grammar checking sites. I found a couple and ran the phrase. I don't remember the sites that I found via Google but they sort of "approved" the final phrase; albeit, with caveats IIRC!

27 posted on 06/24/2004 9:37:26 AM PDT by Seeking the truth ( www.0cents.com - Ronald Reagan Commemorative Stamp Coming Soon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: trebb

If Frenchkerry is elected I expect he will dismantle internal security like the Patriot Act and lighten up in Iraq. At home the saracens will have more space to work and there will be another 911 type event. The ketchup president will not react to that militarily nor will any effective security measures by put in place domestically. It will happen again and maybe a third time before a French administration will react. It will react badly and will suffer outright military defeats. Then I expect desperation measures up to and quite possibly including Nukes. We will still ultimately win this war but it will be ultimately much messier here at home and in the rest of the world with a Democrat, especially this Democrat, at the helm.


28 posted on 06/24/2004 9:38:43 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ThanhPhero
It's whom. Old school. I almost wrote on it. No one hears this anymore. It's whom. In any language.........except common English these days. (sarc)

Frankly, I am proud, if not surprised, that anyone still knows the word.
29 posted on 06/24/2004 9:40:44 AM PDT by combat_boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

Actually, for whom is the most correct.


30 posted on 06/24/2004 9:41:57 AM PDT by combat_boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

RIGHT ON!


31 posted on 06/24/2004 9:43:29 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Ping me when the BC04 campaign has the balls to say that Al Qaeda wants Bush to lose and we shouldn't let the terrorists win with a Bush loss.


32 posted on 06/24/2004 9:53:17 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prion

Agreed, ‘whom’ does sound rather awkward when not preceded by a preposition. It looks like it’s become quite acceptable to use either one in some cases. When it comes to striving to avoid the dangling preposition, I’d use the more natural option (I don’t consider myself an expert at all though).


33 posted on 06/24/2004 1:35:38 PM PDT by aliquis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ThanhPhero
The first uses a preposition to end a sentence with- not good.

Sir, that is a rule up with which I shall not put.

/Churchill

34 posted on 06/24/2004 1:46:13 PM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE

When Clinton pulled down his pants
he made the Islamic people see America
as a disgusting perverted nation.

Clinton whipped it out
and now America takes the whipping.

Never Forget


35 posted on 06/24/2004 3:47:39 PM PDT by Joy Angela (World War I, World War II, Clinton Term III - Don't let it happen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson