Posted on 06/24/2004 8:28:46 AM PDT by SJackson
"Hmmm on the one hand, W is chasing us around with US Marines and tough Army troopers. On the other hand, lurch wants to send the french u.n. after us. Seems like a no brainer. 'Go lurch.'"
U.B.L.
I was recently in Hollywood(Home of the Caliban), and thought I saw an "Al Qaida For Kerrey" bumper sticker!(humor)
Low hanging fruit that will be picked in due time, IMO.
Should be either "who would the terrorists vote for?" or "for whom would the terrorists vote?"
Who would Osama vote for?
Find out - http://members.aol.com/KEEFESM/KERRY/OSAMASVOTE.WMV
Who would Osama vote for?
Find out - http://members.aol.com/KEEFESM/KERRY/OSAMASVOTE.WMV
No, that is not correct.
John Kerry is absolutely the best thing the al-Qaeda/Ba'athists in Iraq have going for them. Iraq, like the US, is in the midst of a political campaign right now, the difference being that in Iraq real bullets and beheadings are used instead of press releases and character assassinations. The threats have no less venom behind them as they are uttered, and the interest in the outcome is deadly serious. Since Bush is inextricably tied to turning over political power in Iraq to the Iraqi Governing Council, Kerry by definition has to take the opposite position, that the power NOT be turned over, it is too soon to trust the Iraqis to govern themselves, the Ba'athists deserve representation, the Kurds and the Shi'ites have too many differences between themselves and with the Sunnis for a civil government to exert real national unity, it was all just for oil, we never sent in enough troops to begin with, the Neo-Cons are the real driving force behind the war in Iraq, this is a diversion from the real aim of capturing Osama ben Ladin, and all this is costing the US government WAY too much, taking funds better spent for the care and feeding of new Democrat voters.
Any questions?
ARE ???
need you ask?
Or, "Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee".
.
"BILL CLINTON told me that he had refused Offers from the Sudan in 1995 & 1996 to hand over OSAMA bin LADEN to us. BILL CLINTON said he did this while saying...
..'OSAMA, Who..?'" =
...DICK MORRIS, twice on 'The Judicial Watch Report Radio Show' - June 2003
DICK MORRIS went on to say that the only reason he couldn't confirm BILL CLINTON's refusing a 3rd OSAMA Offer from the Sudan in 2000 is because MORRIS was no longer in the CLINTON White House by then.
1995 = OSAMA bin LADEN was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing in 1993.
1998 = OSAMA bin LADEN was indicted by the RENO Justice Dept for his bombing of 2 American Embassies in Africa.
1995 = OSAMA Offer refused by CLINTON
1996 = OSAMA Offer refused by CLINTON
2000 = OSAMA Offer refused by CLINTON
CLINTON = OSAMA = 9/11
.
A point that bears repeating - they do not want Kerry because he would "understand" them and thereby allow them to stop attacking us; They want Bush out because he actually does their cause damage.
If they were to get Kerry in, it would only cause many more deaths and then there would be the very real danger of a imbecilic knee-jerk that could cause real world disorder...
Preposition ending a sentence...
It seems, there are two schools of thought here...
Winston Churchill said, for example: "This is the sort of English up with which I cannot put."
:)
The Muslims and, especially the French, are INTERNATIONAL KERRORISTS!!
They all practise KERRORISM!!
KERRORISM is very highly nuanced so as to allow an elitist multi-million who has more houses than most people have shoes and more servants than most people have relatives to convince the despirate left winngers, blacks an union memebrs that he is a man of the people, one of them.
.
NEVER FORGET
The Communist Vietnamese Government is now using KERRY's 1971 comments, calling American Soldiers fighting for Freedom in Vietnam ..rapists & terrorists.. to question America's treatment of Iraqi prisoners..!!!
Sen. KERRY's Remarks Coming Back to Haunt America, Lawmaker says
http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1158692/posts
LOL......that's a real classic!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.