Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Bible translation promotes fornication Archbishop of Canterbury
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | June 24, 2004

Posted on 06/24/2004 7:21:03 AM PDT by take

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-143 next last
To: plushaye
So Gospel of Thomas didn't even make the Apocrypha cut. I guess the writer here needed a space to fill when he cut out Revelation and this "gospel" was convenient.

This so called "gospel" is Gnostic heresy. This book is not Christian. But the DaVinci Code fans will eat this up.

81 posted on 06/24/2004 10:35:22 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (wake me when Bubbapalooza is over)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: synwojciecha
Actually, Peter in Greek is "Petros", which is a masculinization of "Petra," which means "rock." Thus "Rocky" is not all that bad a translation of his name.

Only in the loosest sense. That would be like calling me "Red" or "Foxy" or even "Tricky" because my first name is Russell which means "like a fox". Although these names are all acceptable based on the meaning of the word Russell, doesn't mean they are accurate.

82 posted on 06/24/2004 10:36:35 AM PDT by BSunday (YES, AMERICA CAN !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rrstar96

Shoult not the queen step in and do something? She is head of the english church.


83 posted on 06/24/2004 10:37:08 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
DaVinci Code

Don't even get me started on that. It's such a pile of cr*p. And yet there are folks who think that it's the truth. These are mostly mostly idiots who have never bothered to read the Bible, so they're comparing the Da Vinci garbage against something they don't know anything about. And yet they spout the rot all over. Our enemy is both without(Isllam) and within
84 posted on 06/24/2004 10:40:09 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Good point. It's HER church, then she can authorize/condemn any bible she feels like.


85 posted on 06/24/2004 10:42:41 AM PDT by BSunday (YES, AMERICA CAN !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
And yet there are folks who think that it's the truth. These are mostly mostly idiots who have never bothered to read the Bible,

And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables....

86 posted on 06/24/2004 10:44:27 AM PDT by BSunday (YES, AMERICA CAN !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Cronos; hellinahandcart

:-) well I see hellin is in fine form today!

meanwhile yes, there is a significant Anglican community of freepers representing just about every part of North American Anglicanism as well as several foreign countries. As to what's going on, well, as one who is known for oversimplifying theological stuff let me put it this way: The majority of the Anglican Communion (which by the way is *not* caucasian) led by the Primates (i.e. senior archbishops) from the Southern Hemisphere have let it be known that if the various heretics among the more developed portions of the Northern Hemisphere are not disciplined by the end of this year, the entire Southern Hemisphere contingent, along with any of us Christian Anglicans who want to tag along are out of here. There's an ongoing study that's supposed to find a way to paper this all over (if it does, it will be ignored by our side) that's supposed to report back by the end of September. Leaks from the Eames Commission, as it's known, seem to indicate that the queazy moderates have discovered that there is no way to verbally placate either side, so we'll probably see something that still ends up splitting the Anglican Communion...though exactly how remains to be seen.

In the meantime the heretical elements in the U.S. and Canada have, in some places, taken to openly persecuting the good guys; several of the Southern Hemisphere Provinces are openly supporting mission activities in the US and Canada, and life gets more interesting by the day.

If you want to get a better idea of just how much is going on I suggest you do a search on the Religion Forum for the following keywords: "Anglican,apostasy,heresy,homosexual" . Just be prepared to do some reading, because you'll find there's a substantial ammount of material in the freeper archives on this topic.

Also, if you or anyone you know wants to be added to the Anglican Ping List, just freepmail me and let me know.


87 posted on 06/24/2004 10:44:51 AM PDT by ahadams2 (http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com is the url for the Anglican Freeper Resource Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

You asked "Shoult not the queen step in and do something? She is head of the english church."

well yes and no. Technically she's the head, but the problem is that for the last two centuries the British Royals have had a largely 'hands off' policy in trying to correct problems in the C of E. Moreover this current abortive mistranslation is really only the symptom of a larger disease - if HM were going to do something effective she'd have to start at the top and remove Rowan the fuzzy as ABC. However to even attempt to do that would cause *major* problems in the political and social structures that make up the modern day UK. About the only way she'll be able to get away with it is if Rowan & co do not find a way to hold the Anglican Communion together; and even then what will probably happen will be Rowan goes into an early retirement.

Constitutional monarchies are a pain, especially for the monarchs.


88 posted on 06/24/2004 10:51:24 AM PDT by ahadams2 (http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com is the url for the Anglican Freeper Resource Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: take

Find later bump


89 posted on 06/24/2004 10:57:38 AM PDT by WKB (3!~ What we need is more "Christianity in politics" and less "Politics in Christianity")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BSunday
The difference is that Jesus made up the name "Petros" and gave it to Simon in order to emphasize that he was to be the foundation of the Church. His new name is a play on words, which gets lost if you translate it merely as "Peter."

Still, I agree that translating it as "Rocky" is not appropriate given everything we associated with the name. The play on words can be clarified in a footnote.

90 posted on 06/24/2004 10:58:18 AM PDT by synwojciecha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: johnb838
John with a can of Skoal and a spit cup, spitting in between baptisms.

You probably just ruined my spirituality for every baptismal service I attend for the rest of my life.

91 posted on 06/24/2004 11:00:03 AM PDT by Taliesan (fiction police)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ahadams2

Who will rid me of this meddlesome Priest?

Thomas, Thomas, Thomas. Everyone TALKS about Thomas, but no one ever DOES anything about him!


92 posted on 06/24/2004 11:06:04 AM PDT by johnb838 (When I hear "Allahu Akhbar" it means somebody is about to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: ItsTheMediaStupid

I wasn't finished with my morning caffeine fix yet and thought about that after I wrote it. What I was thinking was that some folks are going to use the word "partner" without considering the context; and nothing will matter to those folks as they'll read whatever they want into it.


93 posted on 06/24/2004 11:27:07 AM PDT by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: take

this is not a 'translation'. it is a vulgar, loose 'interpretation'.


94 posted on 06/24/2004 11:39:56 AM PDT by martin gibson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

If they're not going to follow the letter, then perhaps they should at least honor the spirit of the writing.
This is just pap.


95 posted on 06/24/2004 11:49:57 AM PDT by dyed_in_the_wool (Why do Al Qaeda and DNC press releases always sound the same?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: dyed_in_the_wool

you are being far too kind... on the other hand, it looks like a laugh-riot.


96 posted on 06/24/2004 11:51:01 AM PDT by King Prout (the difference between "trained intellect" and "indoctrinated intellectual" is an Abyssal gulf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: scripter

Archbishop of Canterbury breaks silence on same-sex marriage

By Ivan H. Golden
Staff Writer

June 19, 2004


GREENWICH -- In his first public comments on the same-sex marriage controversy that has divided the Anglican Church, the Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams expressed solidarity last night with the American Episcopal Church. But he stopped short of taking sides in the divisive issue.

"I'm well aware of the crossroads at which we stand," Williams said to an audience of more than 400 people during a fund-raiser at the Hyatt Regency Greenwich.

Williams said he wanted to make two points about the controversy: First, he said, "the present difficulties would feel a lot more difficult were it not for the immense love and generosity shown to me by (the American Episcopal Church)."

Second, Williams said his experience on Sept. 11, 2001 -- when he was caught in lower Manhattan only blocks from the World Trade Center -- had "made it difficult to feel estranged from the struggles of the Episcopal Church in the United States."

The American Episcopal Church has been at odds for more than a year with many Anglican churches worldwide over the Episcopal Church's support for same-sex unions and its vote to elect a gay man, Gene Robinson, as bishop of New Hampshire.

The archbishop of Canterbury, viewed as the worldwide leader of the Anglican Communion, had made no public mention of the controversy until last night, according to several bishops and pastors who attended last night's $1,200-a-plate fund-raiser.

In a brief interview after his speech, Williams declined to talk more about the issue. "I don't think I want to go into that," he said.

Many pastors and bishops who attended the fund-raiser said they were relieved to hear Williams publicly acknowledge the controversy. And at least one, Canon Harold Lewis of Calvary Episcopal Church in Pittsburgh, Pa., said he wished Williams had gone further.

"Many of us, in fact, felt he should have said more," Lewis said. "I think many of us in the Episcopal Church are feeling a little tenuous right now."

But others said Williams' comments struck the right note, particularly given his responsibilities as the worldwide leader of the Anglican Communion.

"I was very grateful that he did bring that up," said the Rev. Jeffrey Walker of Christ Church in Greenwich. "But I'm also grateful that he didn't spend the whole evening on that."

Although the allusion to the same-sex marriage debate was the most surprising aspect of Williams' remarks, the vast majority of the archbishop's 45-minute speech concerned the role of the Anglican Communion and other religious and human-rights groups in the United Nations.

Last night's fund-raiser was expected to raise $400,000 to $500,000 for the Anglican Communion Observer to the United Nations.

The Anglican Observer, a nonvoting representative to the United Nations, lobbies U.N. members on behalf of Anglican issues and Anglican people worldwide. The position was created in 1985.

In his prepared remarks last night, Williams contrasted religious and nonprofit groups, which he said serve the interests of human rights, with U.N. member states, which often bow to political and national concerns before considering human rights, he said.

"There is an urgent need," he said, "for a global, moral perspective."

Andrew Smith, the bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Connecticut, said Williams' speech laid out, "a clear vision of the role of religion in helping bring about world peace."


97 posted on 06/24/2004 12:01:40 PM PDT by take
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix

Archbishop of Canterbury is gay


98 posted on 06/24/2004 12:02:26 PM PDT by take
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Fifth Business
This is not an Anglican translation. It's Baptist.

It was by an Ex-Baptist minister. The think tank he did the work for, the "One organization" sounds like something Soros might pay for.

The One organization that produced the new Bible translation is dedicated to "establish[ing] peace, justice, dignity and rights for all." It is also focused on "sustainable use of the earth's resources," challenging "oppression, injustice, exclusion and discrimination" as well as accepting "one another, valuing their diversity and experience."

99 posted on 06/24/2004 12:06:21 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: plushaye

Other real titles by the same author John Henson:

The Bad Acts of the Apostles - described as "An unusual approach to the study of Acts"

The Gethsemane streaker

Other Temptations of Christ: Lenten Studies for Adventurous Christians

Other Communions of Jesus - "The Christian meal stands at the centre of worship in most Christian traditions. But have we been doing it right?"

They are listed on this website for the "One Translation" people to whom he belongs: http://one.gn.apc.org/Whatwedo.htm
http://one.gn.apc.org/Translation.htm#Matthew

"THE ONE TRANSLATION - The earliest Christian writings in genuinely contemporary language

The ONE translation aims at a new, fresh and adventurous translation of the early Christian scriptures. It is designed both for mature Christians who wish to live in the new millennium and for those who have limited experience of traditional Christianity or may have found it a barrier to an appreciation of Jesus."

The Archbishop of Canterbury has already written the Foreward of another book by John Henson this year called "The Other Temptations of Christ: Lenten Studies for Adventurous Christians ". This blows the theory that he doesn't know what's in the books.

http://www.thegoodbookstall.org.uk/sect_lent_and_easter.html#1830


100 posted on 06/24/2004 12:07:05 PM PDT by plushaye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson