Thanks, that snip it explains it all... he is gaga over Geragos....
This seems to ring true:
(Aired May 27, 2004 - 09:30 ET)
...TED ROWLANDS, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): Both sides in the Peterson case are counting on hired guns to pick a jury.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: We do nothing but look at jurors week in and week out, day in and day out for years.
ROWLANDS: Prosecutors have Howard Barenski (ph). His experience in high-profile cases dates back to 1985 and Bernard Getts. Barenski helped the defense pick a jury that found the New York subway vigilante not guilty of attempted murder. Barenski, who refers to his jurors as "his children," says he's recently proud of his work for the prosecution on the Martha Stewart case, where the jury came back with four guilty verdicts.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: It felt great. It felt like justice was done. And it felt like my children came through.
ROWLANDS: Jo Ellen Demetrius is working for the defense. She, too, has extensive high-profile case experience, starting with the O.J. Simpson trial.
JO ELLEN DEMETRIUS, JURY CONSULTANT: If I were to look at any one case that I felt good walking out of the courtroom about the jury, certainly O.J. would be that jury.
ROWLANDS: Both consultants have spent the last 2 1/2 months in court, scrutinizing every member of the Peterson jury pool.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: There were joys in their facial expressions, how they dress, how they walk, everything.
DEMETRIUS: How they react to the attorneys, too, is a big component of how we're evaluating these people.
(snip)
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0405/27/ltm.04.html