Well, I am confused now; I just finished reading the detective's last day on the stand -- about this report.
It must be me, but I didn't see that as a big "bombshell" like the press made it out to be; he admitted what he did and he said it was in other officers' reports.
What am I missing?
>>What am I missing?<<
Nothing but the spin from the talking heads. Even when the prosecution clears this up on Monday, I think the TH's will still be spinning.
Have you seen Michael Cardoza? He's on almost every channel screaming about how bad the prosecution is. I also saw him on the day that juror #5 spoke to Brent Rocha. He turned him in to the judge because he is an officer of the court.
I'm wondering if he is being paid by Geragos to spin?! Wish there was some way to find out if they have a connection.
Oh, what you're missing is the swell, boffo presentation in which ringmaster Geragos put the report, with the "excised" portions highlighted, up on the screen!
Visuals, visuals! That's how we conduct our circus!
The first thing that would come to my mind, if I were a juror, would be: "If this detective was hiding that info, then how DOES Mr. Geragos know so much about it already?"
We are missing Hammer turning and mouthing "THIS IS BIG" so the media, if not the jurors saw it...and the short recess requested ...so Geragos could escape the courtroom and be seen grinning wide and his staff almost break out in giggles ...I read in that daily diary...an abc station, I believe.
I have been so mad at the disgraceful "reporting" on this case that I emailed them all. I doubt any of them will like my emails but it seems to me that they would like to see and/or participate in setting wife and baby killers free. WHY do these TV Lawyers always seem to prefer the Defense side? I actually think that their reporting has been quite INACCURATE. I do wish this Jury was sequestered tho.