You could make a verbal argument, but not a legal one. Any such argument would be laughed out of a courtroom.
Oh, I agree. I'm just saying it makes as much sense as the argument advanced by the article.
Just as the argument that only a man can be President would be laughed at. Frankly, no serious person would even attempt to bring that argument to a Court.
Depends on the court, for instance, the pain experienced by the baby killed in a partial birth abortion is irrelevant.
The issue of whether fetuses feel pain is unsettled in the scientific community, she wrote. However, it appears to be irrelevant to the question of whether [partial-birth abortion] should be banned, because it is undisputed that if a fetus feels pain, the amount is no less and in fact might be greater in [dismemberment abortion] than with the [partial-birth] method.
Hillary had "unelected" power and attempted to nationalize health care. The case can legally be made (and the term comes from her own phrasing).