Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Silverback
Same-sex 'marriage', like feminism, are two prongs of the long-range plan to destroy the nuclear family, decrease population, stunt human development and destabilize society. This is all about making it easier for the totalitarians to control us in the future. Just recently I learned of Gloria Steinem's roots as a CIA operative. The fact she was in the employ of a U.S. government agency says it all about the supposedly free society we live in.
45 posted on 06/23/2004 7:45:57 AM PDT by Middle Man (No matter who you vote for, the government always gets in.~Neil Innes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All; Middle Man
Could it also be that they are not collecting the info?
Arlen Specter has liberals working in his office.
The want homosexual marriage.

Where is the list of whose vote is where?
Is there a freeper with inside information on the 7 who we can influence?

It is writing time folks.
Before it was striaght party line.
We need to increase the pressure.
Olympia Snow needs a reminder of her moral family history.

This is the senate and house committees that have the Federal Marriage Amendment.
This is at http://www.house.gov and http://www.senate.gov

Write letters of support to all senators and representatives.
These members count the letters of support.

There are now enough states to pass this due to the fact
they individually have DOMA's.
The FMA will take the Federal Gov. out of the marriage
definition game and put it to state legislatures.
This includes Federally making marriage one man one woman for immigration matters.

These members count the letters of support.
Homosexual special interest groups are trying to organize letter campaigns.
This includes internet and (oddly enough) nightclubs.

For those who have not seen it:
H.J. Res. 56 and S.J. Res. 26
Amendment Text:

Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman.
Neither this Constitution or the constitution of any State, nor state or federal law,
shall be construed to require that marital status or the legal incidents thereof be conferred
upon unmarried couples or groups
.


This is very doable.

Chairman Sensenbrenner's Photo

 

US House of Representatives

Committee on the Judiciary

107th Congress Flag

F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr., Chairman

Subcommittee Members

 

Subcommittee on the Constitution

Mr. Steve Chabot, Chairman

362 Ford HOB, Tel: 202-226-7680
Mr. King Mr. Jerrold Nadler
Mr. Jenkins Mr. John Conyers
Mr. Bachus Mr. Robert Scott
Mr. Hostettler Mr. Melvin Watt
Ms. Hart Mr. Adam Schiff
Mr. Feeney  
Mr. Forbes  

 

BELOW IS THE SENATE COMMITTEE WITH THE COMPANION BILL

Committee on the Judiciary image- panel 1  
Frequently Asked Questions Site Map
Smooth right corner image
Committee on the Judiciary- Panel 2
HOME > MEMBERS
top of navigation bar

Members
Subcommittees

Hearings

Nominations Business Meetings Press Information

bottom of navigation bar
Orrin G. Hatch
CHAIRMAN, UTAH
Patrick J. Leahy
RANKING DEMOCRATIC MEMBER, VERMONT
Edward M. Kennedy
MASSACHUSETTS
Arlen Specter
PENNSYLVANIA
Jon Kyl
ARIZONA
Herbert Kohl
WISCONSIN
Dianne Feinstein
CALIFORNIA
Lindsey Graham
SOUTH CAROLINA
Saxby Chambliss
GEORGIA
John Edwards
NORTH CAROLINA
smooth lower right corner image
Smooth left corner image

 BELOW IS A FORM LETTER TO SEND TO THE SENATORS AND HOUSE REPRESENTATIVES

RE: Support in favor of the Federal Marriage Amendment
H.J. Res. 56 and S.J. Res. 26

Dear [ Decision Maker ]

I support the Federal marriage amendment. As your constituent I urge your support to amend the Constitution. Specifically, please cosponsor support H.J. Res. 56 and S.J. Res. 26 when these resolutions should come up for a vote. As you constituent I urge your support to amend the Constitution. Specifically, please cosponsor support H.J. Res. 56 and S.J. Res. 26 when these resolutions should come up for a vote.

This amendment will remove the courts from redefining the marriage based on social activist judges. This will also protect our state from any actions taken or will be taken in any other state. Private sexual behavior should not be the standard which defines marriage. Marriage is a public institution which is how we raise and support societies children. This institution needs protecting by putting into the Constitution what we have today.

This is not the first time the constitution has been used for social issues. All of the Constitution is based on various social issues. This only codifies the law which exists now.

This amendment will remove the Federal Government from this issue and return this topic to the individual state legislatures. The activist courts have made this a federal issue. There are no other options.

Any same sex couple has the legal right to make a private cohabitation agreement, they have the right make powers of attorney and have the right to make health care surrogate directives. These form documents are readily available for nominal cost or free on the Internet. Non of these agreements require any special lawyer help. Marriage under the law is one man and one woman. There is no sexual behavior test. Homosexual rantings to the contrary, their opposition is only attempting to impose public acceptance on what should remain a private consensual behavior.

Please support the support H.J. Res. 56 and S.J. Res. 26, amend the Constitution and protect marriage.

Sincerely,
[Your name]
[Your address]


51 posted on 06/23/2004 8:01:55 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson