To: ArGee; Taliesan
Eventually, the word "marriage" will mean whatever the people using the term want it to mean. At that point, the institution is dead.So long as men and women continue to enter into real marriages, I don't see how the institution is destroyed. As Taliesan posted, "Calling a donkey a horse doesn't hurt the horses."
31 posted on
06/23/2004 7:24:40 AM PDT by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: Know your rights
Eventually, the word "marriage" will mean whatever the people using the term want it to mean. This is true right now. It matters nothing for my marriage, or for my son's eventual marriage. It won't matter two whits to him and his future wife if they let dogs "marry" each other.
Good grief. You can call yourself a Christian now and deny that Jesus rose from the dead. Does that do ANYTHING to my faith?
Nothing.
39 posted on
06/23/2004 7:31:05 AM PDT by
Taliesan
(fiction police)
To: Know your rights; ArGee; Taliesan
"Calling a donkey a horse doesn't hurt the horses."
What happens, is that if you call donkeys horses and expect them to have sex together, you get mules (and jennies) not horses and donkeys, both of which are sterile. The net result is that you get fewer horses.
70 posted on
06/23/2004 8:35:11 AM PDT by
NathanR
(California Si! Aztlan NO!)
To: Know your rights
"So long as men and women continue to enter into real marriages, I don't see how the institution is destroyed. "
The point is that men and women will be *less likely* to continue to enter into real marriages. Real marriage will become more and more rare. Your reasoning is something like 'as long as the car runs, I see no reason to put gas in it'.
93 posted on
06/23/2004 9:52:33 AM PDT by
nosofar
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson