Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairAndBalanced2004
We do not know yet whether Sada was involved or not. "There is no evidence" means only that evidence has not been found. Sadam's involvement is not even relevant. The war is not just a law enforcement action against a gang of criminals and it is not just an act of revenge. The Islamists have declared and are pursuing a war of extermination against Western Civilization and the US is the designated defender of WC.

Iraq is the central real estate of the Islamists' domain and gives us a proximal base that moves the killing to the enemy's doorstep and away from ours. It gives us leverage against Iran and Arabia and Syria which are the shief sponsors and homes of our enemies. Iraq was also much easier to invade than these others would be and we had the "right" to go after Iraq in the eyes of the Arabs because Sadam was our avowed enemy and had attacked our former president. The last item pretty much legitimizes the invasion in the eyes of the arabs if not in the words of their press.

10 posted on 06/23/2004 4:17:50 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson