Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SAS Ordered Into Saudia Arabia To Shield Embassy
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 6-23-2004 | Michael Smith

Posted on 06/22/2004 7:05:05 PM PDT by blam

SAS ordered into Saudi Arabia to shield embassy

By Michael Smith, Defence Correspondent
(Filed: 23/06/2004)

A 25-man SAS team has been sent to Saudi Arabia to bolster security at the British embassy and plan a possible mass evacuation of foreigners, defence sources said last night.

The squad is backed by many more special forces troopers in neighbouring Qatar. This force would be summoned if the 20,000 British citizens in Saudi had to be withdrawn in a hurry.

The members of the SAS team are counter-revolutionary warfare specialists and were deployed last week.

The larger SAS force has been given diplomatic clearance by the Saudi authorities to move straight into the country should any threat develop against the embassy, which is seen as a prime target for Saudi militants linked to al-Qa'eda.

The kingdom has been shaken by a series of attacks in recent months that culminated last week in the beheading of Paul Johnson, an American expatriate worker.

The Saudi leader of the terrorists was later killed as he attempted to dispose of the body.

The deployment is the clearest sign yet that Britain is extremely worried about the worsening security situation in Saudi Arabia, despite assurances from officials that they have the whip hand over home-grown religious zealots.

This month, a television cameraman was killed and a BBC journalist, Frank Gardner, was wounded in a terrorist attack in the Saudi capital.

Two Britons were killed and 15 injured in a bomb attack on a British compound in Riyadh in May last year.

Security agencies have noted that terrorists have been able to strike even in well-protected areas, such as the Riyadh compounds and in al-Khobar, where large numbers of foreign contractors work.

There is a growing sense that al-Qa'eda poses a major threat to the Saudi regime.

"There is very serious nervousness about the situation in Saudi Arabia," one British official said.

Last night the Ministry of Defence dismissed the suggestion that the SAS were protecting the British embassy but would not deny their presence in Saudi Arabia.

The SAS troops, armed with MP5 machineguns and Glock 17 pistols, wear civilian clothes. They have been given clearance by the Saudi authorities to shoot any attacker who tries to kidnap or ambush embassy staff.

They are working closely with Saudi special forces and have surveillance equipment and hi-tech sensors.

A TEAM of Arabic-speaking intelligence officers recruited from Britain's Muslim community will help the SAS.

A senior official said they would act as "eyes and ears" for the SAS team inside the local community. "They will provide vital feedback from the streets and will give us a major foothold in the war against al-Qa'eda," he said.

MI5 and MI6 made strenuous efforts to recruit Arabic-speaking officers from within the British community after the rise of Islamic terrorism and the September 11 attacks.

A room in the embassy has been turned into an operations centre for the SAS team. A Royal Military Police close-protection team has also deployed to the embassy and will act as bodyguards for the ambassador.

Since arriving in Riyadh, the SAS team has been studying the types of target that al-Qa'eda has hit so far in an attempt to identify a pattern of operation.

Members of the team are working around the clock to ensure the safety of diplomatic staff and their families.

They are shadowing British diplomats travelling outside the embassy compound and ensuring that routes used by embassy drivers are changed daily. Anyone who leaves the embassy is offered protection.

The SAS team is making daily security assessments and briefing staff about potential threats as well as identifying weaknesses in protection at the building.

Embassy staff have been advised not to use local buses, to avoid using taxis and not to go shopping on Friday, the Muslim holy day.

Despite the reputation of the SAS, one source expressed concern about the difficulties of tracking al-Qa'eda and working out what it was planning to attack.

"We are always several steps behind them," he said. "They have the initiative because they have been preparing for so long.

"It is clear that safe houses, weapons caches and targets are all pre-determined. There is very little left to chance with these people. Their attacks are ugly but very clinical."

The team has already recommended that stronger defences, including metal mesh netting such as that used to protect police stations in Northern Ireland, be installed to protect the embassy against rocket and mortar attacks.

The Foreign Office is considering that but is reluctant to make the embassy into a fortress and is also considering proposals to move its location.

Contingency plans have already been drawn up to pull out British nationals if al-Qa'eda launches a big attack. The SAS team will be responsible for putting them into practice.

The SAS will act as a forward co-ordination cell for any emergency evacuation. Despite Foreign Office warnings that non-essential staff should leave, more than 20,000 British nationals are still in Saudi Arabia.

A key task for the SAS will be to identify assembly points in the event of an incident.

So many aircraft would be needed to fly the Britons to safety that they would initially be taken to a nearby third country to keep an air bridge free.

A team of Arabic-speaking intelligence officers recruited from Britain's Muslim community will help the SAS.

A senior official said they would act as "eyes and ears" for the SAS team inside the local community. "They will provide vital feedback from the streets and will give us a major foothold in the war against al-Qa'eda," he said.

MI5 and MI6 made strenuous efforts to recruit Arabic-speaking officers from within the British community after the rise of Islamic terrorism and the September 11 attacks.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: arabia; embassy; sas; saudia; saudiarabia; shield; ukembassy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: Ranger
"Any evident concentration of naval ships near Iran?"

With 12 allied carriers on the prowl, I'd bet several of them are headed to the Indian Ocean/Persian Gulf/Mediterranean.
41 posted on 06/22/2004 8:26:07 PM PDT by Rebelbase ( aka Gassybrowneyedbum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather
"where does the family ( all 30K of them) go?"

I expect a large number are already gone. Some are just planning to go. Many will die.

42 posted on 06/22/2004 8:41:15 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: blam

I doubt another president than Carter would have cut the Marine guards to half their number to avoid antagonizing the 'students.' A single 50 cal would have dispersed the mob in about 12 seconds.


43 posted on 06/22/2004 8:43:31 PM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Balloon going up: what I had in mind was covered quite thoughtfully in posts #20 and 31.


44 posted on 06/22/2004 8:44:28 PM PDT by Unknowing (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: blam

mmmwaaa haa ha ha.....


45 posted on 06/22/2004 8:44:46 PM PDT by txhurl (Man, this is so overdue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Unknowing

Post number 40, too, obviously.


46 posted on 06/22/2004 8:46:49 PM PDT by Unknowing (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I doubt another president than Carter would have cut the Marine guards to half their number to avoid antagonizing the 'students.'

He did what? How did I miss that little point?

47 posted on 06/22/2004 8:50:38 PM PDT by Samwise (I posted this tagline "because I could.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Unknowing

what does the Royal family tree look like?


48 posted on 06/22/2004 8:50:53 PM PDT by dusty99999 (AST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: blam

The Saudis run a brutal dictatorship and they can't police their own people ? I'm not fooled.


49 posted on 06/22/2004 8:51:33 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

yes without a doubt. However one that is controled by basically one guy. Okay what about the scenerio of Syria or Iran coming in to stablize things? ... At the kings request?


50 posted on 06/22/2004 8:55:43 PM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: blam

I have a dumb question. what does SAS stand for?


51 posted on 06/22/2004 8:57:52 PM PDT by Floratina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Floratina

Special Air Service, I think.


52 posted on 06/22/2004 8:59:27 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

You could be wrong, but things are usually as they appear to be and unfortunately you have an excellent chance of being right. Would Iran be willing to gamble their entire future on a strong military move anytime soon? If so, who are their allies?


53 posted on 06/22/2004 8:59:51 PM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dusty99999
Check THIS out. The previous page is the founders of the dynasty, which is interesting too, but this may be the stuff you're looking for.

Now, the guys we're looking at maybe fighting it out for the succession are to be found HERE. Look under the "Succession" heading. Prince Abdullah, the nominal Crown Prince (although that was called into doubt in 1992) may be duking it with the Wahhabis' boy Sultan, who has already tried to use his religious connections to oust Abdullah once.

Me, I'm popping some popcorn.

54 posted on 06/22/2004 9:00:25 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: blam
I'm sure if the Brits have SAS there, we have DevGru or Delta boys there as well-

I personally don't see the House of Saud falling - yet if it does, all hell will break loose -

But I just don't see it happening - I think the House of Saud is finally getting serious about taking care of much of Al Qeade as possible -

We need to get Zarqawi (in Iraq) and UBL and Al Zawahiri (In Pakistan) ASAP -

55 posted on 06/22/2004 9:02:01 PM PDT by POA2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: POA2

Yeah but the problem is that the house is divided and will fall. There are all these rich family members that have sympathized and or have been intimidated into supporting these kooks there is no way for the king to clean house.


56 posted on 06/22/2004 9:06:27 PM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Floratina
Special Air Service


57 posted on 06/22/2004 9:10:39 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Nobody, and I mean nobody wants to start a conventional conflict with the United States and Great Britain right now with Saudi Arabia at stake. Iraq was once the principal suspect in a push to take over Saudi Arabia, of course, but obviously no longer, which is (I suspect, anyway) one of the real strategic reasons we intervened there. The Iranians simply do not have the military resources sufficient to effect an opposed invasion across all that open territory, and they'd be insane to try it.

But covertly, that's another story. The Iranians are allied with the Syrians in Lebanon and now Iraq (which is interesting, since they were originally nominal rivals in that 80s conflict in Lebanon). I think, especially if they could trap us into occupying Saudi land, that we'd see a massive influx of funds and arms to whatever insurgents. That's a pretty safe guess - it's what they've been doing in Iraq for the better part of a year.

58 posted on 06/22/2004 9:12:48 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: POA2

I don't see how Saud can stand without wasting literally thousands of its subjects, including all of the Wahabi clerics and all of the AQ cadre and followers. Are the US and Britain going to do this for them? This would involve our guys running a large scale slaughterhouse for the Sauds. How else can this be put down?

I'd like to see a death camp for a few thousand of those folks myself, but I just can't see this actually happening in this age of instant worldwide telecommunication.


59 posted on 06/22/2004 9:13:05 PM PDT by SBprone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather; blam

First where are our tanks?

Did we send many of them back to Germany and the US?


60 posted on 06/22/2004 9:21:51 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson