Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Miss Marple
Clinton:...So Prime Minister Blair was left in an unenviable position. He either had to go with the American position, which he didn’t entirely agree with or go with the European position, which he didn’t entirely agree with.

And in the end I believed he thought that there was still some risk that Saddam had the weapons, that if he stayed involved, he could have an impact on the post-Saddam Iraq. But if he stayed involved, he could keep America and Europe, closer together than they otherwise would have been, and so he made the decision he did. I can’t quarrel with that; he was in a very difficult position.

Thank God---I really mean that---Tony Blair made his stand out of noble conviction and principle. Principles he has held fast to and eloquently defended.

391 posted on 06/22/2004 6:45:43 PM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I DESPISE the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
Thank God---I really mean that---Tony Blair made his stand out of noble conviction and principle. Principles he has held fast to and eloquently defended.

I can't remember where I read it a few years back

But it was an article on how Tony Blair tried to get Clinton to stand up and do something about Saddam and Tony Blair could never get anywhere with Clinton, except for sending a few missiles over to Iraq

Blair's domestic policies I don't agree with .. But he knew how bad Saddam was and how important it was to get rid of Saddam .. and I will always give him credit for that

399 posted on 06/22/2004 6:52:25 PM PDT by Mo1 (50 States baby .. I want all 50 States come November !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson